Started By
Message

re: Cyrus Kouandjio update

Posted on 1/31/11 at 2:00 am to
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81781 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 2:00 am to
quote:

in the unlikely event that no adequate proof that AU paid Cam ever turns up, what will be your take?
That they were unable to find adequate evidence.
Posted by auburntiger77
Glendale
Member since Dec 2010
2044 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 6:53 am to
quote:

So, if Auburn is proven to have paid Cam.... what will your tune change to? Are you going to defend Auburn then? Are you going to offer an excuse?


I do not think that happens, but IF it does, then I will continue to pull for my team. I would want Cam stricken from all Auburn records books. There is simple ZERO proof that anyone from Auburn gave CAM any money... I still believe in innocent until proven quilty... Lies, Rumours, Innuendo and a sick sub-society with their 1000 page thread does not change that....
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81781 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 6:55 am to
quote:

I still believe in innocent until proven quilty when it applies to AU
Posted by auburntiger77
Glendale
Member since Dec 2010
2044 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 6:56 am to
quote:

quote:


I still believe in innocent until proven guilty when it applies to A


And many of this board believe "Guilty until proven innocent when it applies to Auburn"

Is that your stand???? It seems to be...

This post was edited on 1/31/11 at 9:52 am
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81781 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 6:58 am to
quote:

Is that your stand????
First, I assume you mean "stance".

Second I believe if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck. . .it's a damn duck.
Posted by ehole
in a house
Member since Nov 2010
3373 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 7:07 am to
quote:

And many of this board believe "Quilty until proven innocent when it applies to Auburn"


i believe auburn to be extremely "quilty" maybe even a little blankety
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 8:44 am to
quote:

It is when the current coach has a MUCH better coaching record at the school than Gene Chizik


So you're saying chiz isn't as good of a coach as Paul Rhodes?
Posted by BamaInHsv
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
17889 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 8:47 am to
Do we have to talk about Cam Newton and Auburn in every fricking thread on this board?
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53586 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 8:48 am to
you started it
Posted by BamaInHsv
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
17889 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 8:53 am to
I did?!?!?!
Posted by BamaInHsv
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
17889 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 8:55 am to
I just scanned this whole thread, to make sure I hadn't forgotten a post, and I didn't start anything about Auburn OR Cam, catfood-breath. frick off.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53586 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 8:55 am to
you = collectively every other fan base besides Auburn

Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
31652 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 9:47 am to
quote:


There is simple ZERO proof that anyone from Auburn gave CAM any money... I still believe in innocent until proven quilty... Lies, Rumours, Innuendo and a sick sub-society with their 1000 page thread does not change that....







Hate to break it to you 77 - but the NCAA doesn't have to have PROOF.

They can act on "reasonable suspension" if they choose.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 9:52 am to
quote:

"reasonable suspension"
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
19455 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 10:18 am to
quote:

in the unlikely event that no adequate proof that AU paid Cam ever turns up, what will be your take?

That they were unable to find adequate evidence.



And you'd be willing to accept that the NCAA reached that conclusion because there wasn't any adequate evidence to be found?

Or would you ascribe to the "NCAA was in on it, they shielded AU because of the $$$$" theory?
Posted by FTBLFN
Nashville, TN
Member since Jan 2010
5446 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 10:19 am to
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81781 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 11:43 am to
quote:

WDE24
Yeah. . .alot of English teachers are weeping right now.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81781 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 11:44 am to
quote:

And you'd be willing to accept that the NCAA reached that conclusion because there wasn't any adequate evidence to be found?
That is only an option.

Perhaps I would assume that they just were not able to find evidence. . .not that there was none.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
90285 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Dude! You have a 7-5 team without Cam Newton..

You will see
exactly,Auburn fans have replaced us in the delusional realm....
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 1/31/11 at 11:46 am to
I'm gonna claim we have the cleanest program EVAR and that's why no one can find anything.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter