Started By
Message
re: College Football Tiers
Posted on 6/28/21 at 7:02 pm to Sput
Posted on 6/28/21 at 7:02 pm to Sput
So, in your mind, that makes Auburn an elite program. UGA has ownership papers of Auburn football this century, and has been much more relevant. That NC trophy, bought and paid for by Milt McGregor and Bobby Lowder, doesn’t impress anyone outside of Auburn, Alabama. It has so much tarnish on it all the Tarn-X in the world won’t remove it.
PS, just thought I’d check out ‘22 recruiting rankings to see where SEC teams are. Got tendinitis in my thumb before I scrolled to Auburn. 3 recruits? Gustav has 6 and is ranked 18 places higher.
PS, just thought I’d check out ‘22 recruiting rankings to see where SEC teams are. Got tendinitis in my thumb before I scrolled to Auburn. 3 recruits? Gustav has 6 and is ranked 18 places higher.
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 6/28/21 at 8:20 pm to BrotherDawg84
It's fricking stupidity to put Boise in a tier above Florida.
Where in the hell do y'all find these dumbass sites?
Where in the hell do y'all find these dumbass sites?
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 6/28/21 at 8:57 pm to LSUdude247
quote:
Only team in tier 1 should be Bama
Yes.
quote:
Tier 2 should be:
LSU
And then you shite bed
Posted on 6/28/21 at 8:58 pm to BrotherDawg84
quote:
That NC trophy, bought and paid for by Milt McGregor and Bobby Lowder, doesn’t impress anyone outside of Auburn, Alabama.
All I see is “Wahhh! 1980! Wahhh!
If it were so easy, you dumb fricks should’ve been able to buy one yourself in the last 4 fricking decades.
Of course you’re the dumb arse who started this thread with the same topic half a page down.
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 6/28/21 at 9:00 pm to BrotherDawg84
Boise St doesn't belong in tier 2.
LSU doesn't belong in tier 2...they should be in tier 3 or lower.
The rest look alright.
LSU doesn't belong in tier 2...they should be in tier 3 or lower.
The rest look alright.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 9:17 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I'm ok if Alabama is above everyone else but Clemson definitely deserves separation from all the others in Tier 2
I hate to agree but they have multiple playoff appearances and titles. An even playoff record with Bama too. Tier 1 of current programs, aka playoff era is Bama and Clemson, Tier 2 tOSU and LSU because they have won playoff games and a title each. Then we proceed to tier 3 which would include teams like OU who make the playoffs and then get their asses kicked.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 9:27 pm to BrotherDawg84
Tier 2 has 4 National Championships in the 2000s
3 by one team-. Something wrong there
3 by one team-. Something wrong there
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:02 pm to BrotherDawg84
quote:
PS, just thought I’d check out ‘22 recruiting rankings to see where SEC teams are. Got tendinitis in my thumb before I scrolled to Auburn. 3 recruits? Gustav has 6 and is ranked 18 places higher.
Thanks for checking in on us bud. I don’t worry with checking in on y’all since I already know how your season ends
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:22 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
by one team-. Something wrong there
The problem's with who won them. They have less overall wins than the others except 2, been to less bowl games, etc. LSU's just doesn't have the class of the others. They need to be lower.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:28 pm to Terrific Tales
Obviously not thought through here.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 11:59 pm to Hyde_WDE
quote:
Boise State LMFAO
Yet, Auburn hired Harsin from BSU!
This post was edited on 6/29/21 at 12:01 am
Posted on 6/29/21 at 12:30 am to JetDawg
quote:It is not about perceived class. It is about winning tradition. Something a UGA fan would not understand.
LSU's just doesn't have the class of the others. They need to be lower.
1980
Posted on 6/29/21 at 12:57 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
LSU's just doesn't have the class of the others. They need to be lower.
It is not about perceived class. It is about winning tradition. Something a UGA fan would not understand.
Maybe try flipping UGA schedule with LSU? See how that would work? I'm sure UGA fans wouldn't like that. :)
This post was edited on 6/29/21 at 1:04 am
Posted on 6/29/21 at 1:10 am to BrotherDawg84
How many teams in tiers one and two would be as successful if they played in the SEC?
Posted on 6/29/21 at 5:54 am to BrotherDawg84
1980, Boise, and Oregon are not in the same tier as LSU.
Posted on 6/29/21 at 9:23 am to TrueLefty
quote:Get out of here with that clear, cogent argument. This is tSECRant
Maybe try flipping UGA schedule with LSU? See how that would work? I'm sure UGA fans wouldn't like that. :)
Posted on 6/29/21 at 9:54 am to viceman
quote:
I hate to agree but they have multiple playoff appearances and titles. An even playoff record with Bama too. Tier 1 of current programs, aka playoff era is Bama and Clemson, Tier 2 tOSU and LSU because they have won playoff games and a title each. Then we proceed to tier 3 which would include teams like OU who make the playoffs and then get their asses kicked.
I think if you look at the landscape a bit, Clemson may be on their way down slightly. They have given up 100 points in their last two playoff games, ironically to LSU and OSU whom you have a tier below them.
I think if you asked 100 people which program you think has more success over the next decade between OSU and Clemson, a solid majority would say OSU. Now we all know things change at a drop of a hat, but I have no problem with there being 3-5 teams in both Tier 1 and Tier 2. There are realistically 6-8 programs who probably feel they can win a national title going into a season.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News