Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/2/11 at 7:57 pm to LOYALBAMA
quote:
Couldn't happen to a better bunch.
I agree. The only way this gets better is if it comes out that a bitter Phil Fulmer was a secret witness, and spilled the beans on hostessgate while secretly meeting with investigators at the Chattanooga Shoneys.
Posted on 2/2/11 at 7:58 pm to 87BAMAGRAD
Serious question for the Bammers. DO you guys really think this is going to be Albert Means v2?
Posted on 2/2/11 at 8:03 pm to ohiovol
No, it won't be that nearly that bad. But I do want all of you Vols to suffer for a few years just to even the score a little.
Posted on 2/2/11 at 8:06 pm to 87BAMAGRAD
quote:Well if the past few years haven't been bad enough, you may have to settle for basketball penalties.
No, it won't be that nearly that bad. But I do want all of you Vols to suffer for a few years just to even the score a little.
How severe were Bama's penalties, anyways? Like in comparison to USC.
This post was edited on 2/2/11 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 2/2/11 at 8:11 pm to ohiovol
25 lost scholly's over three years, two year postseason ban. But, recruiting dropped to in the '40's. It hurt not only the quantity, but the quality of players Alabama was signing.
Posted on 2/2/11 at 8:59 pm to 87BAMAGRAD
quote:The coaching situations had to have had a big part in that, too. (Although I guess the sanctions affected the coaches Bama could hire)
25 lost scholly's over three years, two year postseason ban. But, recruiting dropped to in the '40's. It hurt not only the quantity, but the quality of players Alabama was signing.
So for 25 over 3 years, does that mean they have to be using 25 less after 3 years, or do they have to drop a certain amount each year?
This post was edited on 2/2/11 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 2/2/11 at 9:01 pm to ohiovol
Is this really happening or is it some type of rumor? I don't think UT will get hit too hard.
Posted on 2/2/11 at 9:02 pm to ohiovol
We signed around 20 in 2001. Then we signed 15 in 2002, 18 in 2003, and 21 in 2004. Coaching changes made the sanctions even worse. Then academic cases got some guys.
Posted on 2/2/11 at 9:29 pm to gatordmb89
quote:I feel comfortable in saying the article, especially the title, makes things seem worse than they actually will be. Could be wrong, but 'smacked' makes it seem bad. I think UT basketball will get smacked, especially if Pearl stays. I think football should be okay.
Is this really happening or is it some type of rumor? I don't think UT will get hit too hard.
Posted on 2/2/11 at 9:29 pm to 87BAMAGRAD
frick Lane Kiffin.
Posted on 2/2/11 at 10:17 pm to lowspark12
be glad you are rid of that scum UT. I know peopel on here said he would have you on probation within 3 years. Aubbies i would not say shite if I were u. people who live in glass houses should not throw stones, and people under investigation should not delight in others problems. They got rid of kiffin you doubled down.
Posted on 2/2/11 at 10:17 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:Unfortunately, that's not how it happened.
They got rid of kiffin
Page 4 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News