Started By
Message
re: Cecil Hurt Says You're All Stupid or Scared
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:03 am to Teague
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:03 am to Teague
quote:
If you're going to make this argument, then you have to let Houston in. Are they they #2 team?
I would vote Houston in the BCSCG over Alabama, yes. Is this difficult for you?
1
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:04 am to Teague
quote:
And not a single one of you has or can dispute what Cecil has said. Instead you flame childishly.
There's nothing to dispute.
LSU is in it.
If you want to cry your way in -- we don't care.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:05 am to Teague
1. I did not read the article
2. Cecil Hurt could be a janitor for all I know (no offense to janitors)
3. Alabama fans, in reverse roles, would be saying how "LSU isn't worthy of a rematch", but worried about facing LSU again.
Does it really matter what LSU fans think? Ask yourselves.
2. Cecil Hurt could be a janitor for all I know (no offense to janitors)
3. Alabama fans, in reverse roles, would be saying how "LSU isn't worthy of a rematch", but worried about facing LSU again.
Does it really matter what LSU fans think? Ask yourselves.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:05 am to Teague
quote:This doesn't even make sense. If Houston was voted #2, then yes, they should play. If Bama is voted #2, they should play. If OSU is voted #2, they should play.
If you're going to make this argument, then you have to let Houston in. Are they they #2 team?
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:05 am to Teague
I have accepted that Bama is going to hold on to #2 and go to the BCSNCG, even though I don't like it.
But it will be interesting to see how many of the human voters try to change it. I am 99.9% sure it won't be enough.
But it will be interesting to see how many of the human voters try to change it. I am 99.9% sure it won't be enough.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:06 am to Rex
quote:
I would vote Houston in the BCSCG over Alabama, yes. Is this difficult for you?
Ok, so next year Boise goes undefeated, TCU goes undefeated, and LSU is 11-1. BSU vs. TCU for the NC right?
You're full of shite if you say "yes". 
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:06 am to NaturalBeam
quote:
OSU has more better wins than Bama does.
YUP
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:07 am to NaturalBeam
quote:
This doesn't even make sense. If Houston was voted #2, then yes, they should play. If Bama is voted #2, they should play. If OSU is voted #2, they should play.
Obviously, but we're arguing about where they should be voted, not what happens if they're voted that way.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:08 am to Teague
quote:Sure, but this is all the BCS system guarantees you.
Obviously, but we're arguing about where they should be voted, not what happens if they're voted that way.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:10 am to Teague
How exactly do you guys think bama will beat lsu?
They can't and they wont
They can't and they wont
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:11 am to NaturalBeam
quote:
Sure, but this is all the BCS system guarantees you.
If it's not about the two best teams, then why is Houston not #1 or #2?
If it is about the two best teams, how is a team that lost to Iowa State better than a team that lost to LSU?
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:12 am to Teague
quote:
cecil.hurt@tuscaloosanews.com
The Tuscaloosa News? Really? C'mon man.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:12 am to dreaux
quote:
How exactly do you guys think bama will beat lsu?
They can't and they wont
Go argue this with your friends at P.E. That's not what this thread is about.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:12 am to cyogi
quote:
The Tuscaloosa News? Really? C'mon man.
If you can dispute what he says, go for it. Otherwise it's just more excuses.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:14 am to Teague
quote:Because no one thinks Houston is better than Bama. Some people legitimately think OSU is better than Bama. The computers do. Add in the fact that some voters don't want to see a rematch, and the "2nd best" in your mind might not get in. Voters can vote however they want. All the BCS guarantees is that the 2nd-ranked team gets in, not the 2nd-best team.
If it's not about the two best teams, then why is Houston not #1 or #2?
quote:Bama's loss is certainly better, but OSU might win the resume test.
If it is about the two best teams, how is a team that lost to Iowa State better than a team that lost to LSU?
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:18 am to Teague
quote:
Teague
When you have to rely on charity, it's appropriate to say thank you and not get too cocky.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:22 am to NaturalBeam
quote:
Because no one thinks Houston is better than Bama.
Obviously most people think Bama is better than OSU too.
IF OSU blow out OU, and people legitimately change their minds, fine. But most of you here think Bama IS the #2 but don't think they should play again because you've already beaten us, which has nothing to do with BCS rules.
quote:
Add in the fact that some voters don't want to see a rematch
It's not about what they want to see. It's about who they think is best.
quote:
Voters can vote however they want.
Can they? Can they vote Maryland #1? If they believe Bama is #2 but vote them down to avoid a rematch that's ok?
quote:
All the BCS guarantees is that the 2nd-ranked team gets in, not the 2nd-best team.
But voters are expected to vote whoever they want as #2 whether they believe it or not, right? There aren't any inherent expectations?
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:22 am to jbg6
quote:
When you have to rely on charity, it's appropriate to say thank you and not get too cocky.
Nice one. Now back to the kiddie pool.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:23 am to Teague
quote:
Cecil Hurt Says You're All Stupid or Scared
9-6
Posted on 11/27/11 at 11:24 am to cyogi
quote:
1. I did not read the article
2. Cecil Hurt could be a janitor for all I know (no offense to janitors)
3. Alabama fans, in reverse roles, would be saying how "LSU isn't worthy of a rematch", but worried about facing LSU again.
Does it really matter what LSU fans think? Ask yourselves.
mother fricking THIS.
Page 4 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News