Started By
Message

re: Can we all admire how terrible these calls were?

Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:18 pm to
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
34127 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:18 pm to
This is almost as humiliating a topic as your white people commit a disproportionately higher number of hate crimes and then provides stats that proved that wasn't true thread.


Damn dude, you have gotten dumber since Mobile.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:18 pm to
quote:


I mean, you've probably got the better point here about the should/whether distinction, but it's just a very weird end result. I can't see myself being a replay official arguing for an ejection in either case.


Because it's not targeting. It's just roughing the passer.. maybe. Honestly, even that is a tacky call considering the QB was throwing the ball as the defender was in his face.
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 2:21 pm
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:21 pm to
quote:


This is almost as humiliating a topic as your white people commit a disproportionately higher number of hate crimes and then provides stats that proved that wasn't true thread.



That thread is a work of art
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 2:21 pm
Posted by NardDog
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2015
264 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:23 pm to
Still would rather be a Tiger. You all can say what you want but you wish you had a program like LSU. State won last night. We get it.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:24 pm to
quote:


Still would rather be a Tiger. You all can say what you want but you wish you had a program like LSU. State won last night. We get it.


I would trade straight up right now they will probably be better than LSU for at least the next two seasons
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 2:28 pm
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
23343 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:33 pm to
As long as we are reviewing stuff...

LSU Passing 13/29 137 yds
LSU Rushing 133 yds

Miss St Passing 15/23 180 yds
Miss St Rushing 285



Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
9313 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:34 pm to
1st pic, you see him lower his head to hit with top of helmet.

#2 - still trying to figure out that weird head jerk on the QB
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 2:36 pm
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:35 pm to
quote:


1st pic, you see him lower his head to hit with top of helmet


Facemask went into the QBs facemask, yes.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:36 pm to
quote:


LSU Passing 13/29 137 yds
LSU Rushing 133 yds

Miss St Passing 15/23 180 yds
Miss St Rushing 285


Honestly, it felt like Miss St. Had about 750 yards of offense. What a beating
Posted by SBC
Member since Oct 2005
6886 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:39 pm to
The PI is one of the worst calls I have ever seen. Completely altered the complexsion of the game
Posted by joshua2571
Member since Nov 2015
8293 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:39 pm to
Those 30 points that refs took away from LSU will keep LSU from being bowl eligible. Just face it, Hiring Coach O was the worst hire in LSU history.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Facemask went into the QBs facemask, yes

Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:44 pm to
I'm still holding out hope that Ed Orgeron will prove a better hire than Mike Archer.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:44 pm to
quote:


I think we're disagreeing over what the "crown" of a football helmet actually is. To me, if it's facemask-to-facemask contact, then by definition, it's not leading with the crown.

Regarding helmet-to-helmet, if that's the rules, then that's the rules, and I don't care so much about the personal fouls... but the ejections are just an absurd result, no matter how I look at it. That's just not targeting to me.

In the first case, the LSU player held back some on purpose and didn't hit the QB with full force. It almost looked like a half-speed drill. In the second case, there was no lowering of the head or coiling at all--where else is the D-lineman going to go on that play?

I mean, you've probably got the better point here about the should/whether distinction, but it's just a very weird end result. I can't see myself being a replay official arguing for an ejection in either case.


We may be, but I'm seeing the traditional "Jack fell down and broke his crown" hit there. You'd think with as many cameras and angles as they have nowadays, there'd be a clearly video closeup of the hit from a perpendicular angle.

I will grant that ejection seems a bit iffy, but I think that's because the NCAA is trying to send a message about these hits. Once things settle down and people adjust their tackling/blocking styles, I suspect ejection will be far less common even for hits identical to these because the NCAA no longer has a burner under the refs' asses over the issue.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:48 pm to
quote:


Those 30 points that refs took away from LSU will keep LSU from being bowl eligible. Just face it, Hiring Coach O was the worst hire in LSU history.


It's certainly the worst hire in modern history
Posted by joshua2571
Member since Nov 2015
8293 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:49 pm to
In 2 years, Coach O will have LSU going 4-8 and 5-7 every season that he coaches. Alleva failed you. I hope O has a long tenure at LSU.
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 2:51 pm
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:51 pm to
quote:


I will grant that ejection seems a bit iffy, but I think that's because the NCAA is trying to send a message about these hits.


Let's just get rid of roughing the passer entirely and make all hits on QBs once the ball leaves their fingertips ejections. Because that is what happened here.

If the QB still had the ball and was in a throwing motion neither hit would have been flagged for targeting. Agree?
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

I will grant that ejection seems a bit iffy, but I think that's because the NCAA is trying to send a message about these hits. Once things settle down and people adjust their tackling/blocking styles, I suspect ejection will be far less common even for hits identical to these because the NCAA no longer has a burner under the refs' asses over the issue.


Yeah. That does make sense. I guess I'm guilty of just wanting refs to have more judgmental discretion than they actually have at this point, and there is a logic to having a transition phase of strict enforcement.

God. What an awful game. Everything went wrong, and even if everything had went right, LSU would still have gotten its arse kicked. I'm still in shock at how badly our linebackers got beaten.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

If the QB still had the ball and was in a throwing motion neither hit would have been flagged for targeting. Agree?

Completely disagree.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

In 2 years, Coach O will have LSU going 4-8 and 5-7 every season that he coaches. Alleva failed you. I hope O has a long tenure at LSU.


Alleva is obviously a REC plant
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter