Started By
Message
re: Building the Best SEC Team
Posted on 11/4/22 at 4:37 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Posted on 11/4/22 at 4:37 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
QB - Tennessee
quote:
Mmmm…no
Mmmm...yes
This is not last year. Hooker is the best in the nation this year.
You Bammers can pout all you want about that fact.
0
Posted on 11/4/22 at 4:41 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
UGAs Oline and Dline haven’t really stood out. Vols Oline and Mizzous Dline
Honest question. You say our DLine has not stood out. You don't like our secondary.
Is it our LBs that have us in the top 5 in defense? All by themselves?
Posted on 11/4/22 at 4:49 pm to AuburnTigers
No Peyton was a level above Danny waffles, what you meant to say was Danny played for a cutting edge offensive mind and one of the best play callers in college football and Peyton had phat Phil
Posted on 11/4/22 at 4:56 pm to REBEL5 AC
Posted on 11/4/22 at 5:10 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Honest question. You say our DLine has not stood out. You don't like our secondary. Is it our LBs that have us in the top 5 in defense? All by themselves?
I actually said the secondary hasn’t been tested this year. Which is fair and accurate. And I said in the context that on paper (or for the kids a video game) UGA should blow the Vols out. The Dline really lacks the stats, especially considering the level of competition played and is missing enough to to really be unimpressive.
Honestly it looks more like Clemson syndrome, where you coast and show up for 1 game a year so far. Not saying UGA sucks, or lacks talent but so far it’s not showing up. 99 in TFL, 120 in sacks, but 5th in running D. So they are making tackles against bad teams, but not bothering the QB. Not ideal against an O like the Vols.
Posted on 11/4/22 at 5:11 pm to ScoggDog
quote:
Surprised you didn't list TE as a group. And that would go to Georgia.
I was high and thought I did lol
Definitely UGA
Posted on 11/4/22 at 8:45 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
I actually said the secondary hasn’t been tested this year. Which is fair and accurate.
Ok. I took that to mean you felt they were not good. I'm not going back through your posts to double check. You post as much as I do and it would be tedious to double check. But, you would be right to say they have not been tested by a high powered passing attack.
quote:Except when you win a title you better show up for more than one game a year, wouldn't you say?
Honestly it looks more like Clemson syndrome, where you coast and show up for 1 game a year so far.
Before the season some thought Oregon would be a big test. We blew them out and suddenly they were not good. Then when they start beating everybody else handily it is because they play in the PAC 12.
It's the same song different verse. Whoever is ranked highly hasn't played anybody....yet somehow manage to win a championship of some type.
quote:Except for leading the nation in QB throwaways? That usually means the QB is bothered. Hey. We'll know tomorrow. I think UT is legit, btw. This game scares me. I would not be surprised if we got beat. But tell me. If we find a way to win, will we have been tested, or will it just be that UT really wasn't all that good, after all? Or maybe it was a fluke? Or...or...or...
but not bothering the QB.
Posted on 11/5/22 at 6:21 am to DawgsLife
No one educated thought Oregon stood a chance to be fair
Posted on 11/5/22 at 7:01 am to REBEL5 AC
Go frick yourself pussy
Posted on 11/5/22 at 8:29 am to LSU_connoisseur
Mad much? Lol
Posted on 11/5/22 at 8:41 am to REBEL5 AC
Just stating facts.
Page 6 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News