Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:20 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:
Getting blown out is a whole different universe.
1 17 point loss to the #2 team in the nation > 2 losses to unranked teams (easily the worst universe)
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:21 pm to LSUgrad88
quote:
The Vols beat you 35-14 dip shite. How is that lucky??
The vols didnt get lucky against UGA.
The vols got lucky against UK, Vandy, and SC. That's how bad they were playing to end the season.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:23 pm to djsdawg
2 OT losses > getting blown out in conference title game (easily the worst universe)
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:26 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:
2 OT losses > getting blown out in conference title game (easily the worst universe)
2 losses is never LESS than 1 loss.
You might need to get back to 1st grade metro.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:27 pm to djsdawg
An SEC title is never LESS than not having an SEC title.
You might need to get back to 1st grade djs.
You might need to get back to 1st grade djs.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:33 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
12-1 is always better than 11-2 in the context of luck required.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:34 pm to djsdawg
quote:
The vols didnt get lucky against UGA.
The vols got lucky against UK, Vandy, and SC. That's how bad they were playing to end the season.
Vols beat Kentucky by 2, you beat them by 11.
Vols beat Vandy by 1, you beat them by 3.
Vols beat South Carolina by 4, you lost to them.
You only beat Troy by 11.
You only beat Vandy by 3.
Vols pushed your shite in.
Sounds like Georgia was lucky to only have 2 losses.
And I can't believe you're still bitching about this, your melt has went on for like 4 pages.
Holy shite.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:36 pm to djsdawg
quote:
12-1 is always better than 11-2 in the context of luck required.
An SEC title is always better than no SEC title in the context of luck required.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:59 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Vols beat Kentucky by 2, you beat them by 11.
Vols beat Vandy by 1, you beat them by 3.
Vols beat South Carolina by 4, you lost to them.
You only beat Troy by 11.
You only beat Vandy by 3.
Vols pushed your shite in.
Sounds like Georgia was lucky to only have 2 losses.
You are really struggling to understand the point, which has been about how each team was playing in the 2nd half of the season going into December.
quote:
And I can't believe you're still bitching about this, your melt has went on for like 4 pages.
To make that confusion look even worse, you are now confusing simple participation in a discussion with "bitching" and "melting".
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:00 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
And I can't believe you're still bitching about this, your melt has went on for like 4 pages.
2007 LSU still hurts jawja.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:02 pm to djsdawg
quote:
You are really struggling to understand the point, which has been about how each team was playing in the 2nd half of the season going into December.
2007 Georgia only beat Vandy by 3 and Troy by 11 in the second half of the season.
Again, what point are you even attempting (and failing) to make?
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:06 pm to djsdawg
quote:
LSU 2007 is the luckiest MNC team of all time. Far luckier than their 2003 team, who might be 2nd on the list.
I’d call it an anomaly over luck. Everyone had 2 losses other than an overrated Ohio state team that got smoked by LSU. It’s more of an anomaly than anything else.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:07 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:
An SEC title is always better than no SEC title in the context of luck required.
Only if its with 1 loss. Here is the correct luck required TIER order, from no luck to extra luck:
1. Undefeated SEC champ (Bama 09, Au 10, LSU 19, Bama 20, UGA 22)
2. 12-1 SEC champ (LSU 03, UF 06, UF 08, Bama 12, Bama 15)
3. 12-1 non SEC champ (UGA 21)
4. 11-1 non SEC division champ (Bama 11, Bama 17)
5. 11-2 SEC champ (LSU 07)
Maybe one day UF can reach tier 1.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:08 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Only if its with 1 loss.
Wrong.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:10 pm to djsdawg
quote:
The vols got lucky against UK, Vandy, and SC. That's how bad they were playing to end the season.
And you got the shite beat out of you by that team. Christ, stop the bleeding dude. You’re getting massacred.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:16 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
2007 Georgia only beat Vandy by 3 and Troy by 11 in the second half of the season.
Again, what point are you even attempting (and failing) to make?
Since it helps pass the time, lets try again with a quiz at the end..........
Final 5 games from October 27th - November 24th:
- UT needed miracles to beat unranked Vandy, unranked UK, and unranked SC.
- UGA beat #13 UF, #15 AU, and unranked UK by double digits.
Which team was playing better IYO?
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:18 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:
Wrong.
Do you think UF will ever have a tier 1 season like UGA, AU, Bama, LSU, and UT have had?
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:19 pm to djsdawg
quote:
- UT needed miracles to beat unranked Vandy, unranked UK, and unranked SC.
- UGA beat #13 UF, #15 AU, and unranked UK by double digits.
Holy
Fricking
Shite
So your entire stance is that for a stretch of 3 games, Georgia was the better team?
Do you understand how stupid that sounds?
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:20 pm to LSUgrad88
quote:
And you got the shite beat out of you by that team. Christ, stop the bleeding dude. You’re getting massacred.
The existence of those 2 losses will always protect me from losing in a discussion like this.
I understand why LSU fans are angered by the mention of luck, as no program has been luckier, but its more humorous to see a UF fan choose to take the bullets with yall.
Page 15 of 16
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News