Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/4/09 at 11:49 am to roadGator
quote:
The only possible victims I see from the SEC are:
Vandy, MSU, Aubies, KYjellies.
So you came away impressed by USCe last night?
Posted on 9/4/09 at 11:59 am to BuckeyeFan87
quote:defensively? Absolutely.
So you came away impressed by USCe last night?
BSU looked good defensively because Oregon was retarded offensively. BSU looked retarded offensively, too, but Oregon sucks on defense.
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:06 pm to Roaad
Doesn't matter if you can't score though. BSU has enough trick plays to get a TD every now and then.
Either way, not the point. I can 100% say after watching both school last night that I would never put money on USCe > BSU.
(that's not to say that I would do vise-versa either, but I'd probably put my money on BSU before USCe)
Either way, not the point. I can 100% say after watching both school last night that I would never put money on USCe > BSU.
(that's not to say that I would do vise-versa either, but I'd probably put my money on BSU before USCe)
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:09 pm to BuckeyeFan87
I think USCE would just run up the gut on BSU. USC's O-Line would dominate the line on Boise.
USC would win. . .in a blowout.
I think Vandy could beat Boise this year. MSU and UK would lose to BSU, though.
USC would win. . .in a blowout.
I think Vandy could beat Boise this year. MSU and UK would lose to BSU, though.
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:12 pm to Roaad
i think they would be even better if they were able to recruit SEC athletes. same goes for Utah
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:13 pm to Roaad
quote:
USC would win. . .in a blowout.
Nah... USC looks like crap on offense. NCSU looked awful last night and almost pulled it out. It's only 1 game but BSU would beat them right now on a neutral field.
It would be a decent game tho.
This post was edited on 9/4/09 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:13 pm to Bwana Whiskey
quote:They would still be recruiting in Idaho/Washington/Oregon
i think they would be even better if they were able to recruit SEC athletes. same goes for Utah
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:16 pm to Billy Mays
quote:I just think USCE's O-Line would be too much for the BSU front 7.
Nah... USC looks like crap on offense. NCSU looked awful last night and almost pulled it out. It's only 1 game but BSU would beat them right now on a neutral field.
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:19 pm to Billy Mays
quote:
Nah... USC looks like crap on offense. NCSU looked awful last night and almost pulled it out.
Exactly.
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:22 pm to Tompy45
um...they LOST the bowl last year, moron.
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:22 pm to BuckeyeFan87
South Carolina would have no beat Boise State no matter where the game was played. South Carolina needs to fix their offense or they may not win an SEC game this year.
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:26 pm to Roaad
quote:
They would still be recruiting in Idaho/Washington/Oregon
People on here say no one of any real talent from the South wants to play in Starkville in front of 55K. Let's see Boise try to recruit the South with the promise of playing in front of 34K on blue turf in Idaho.
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:27 pm to gatorprincess815
quote:
gatorprincess815
Boise State vs SEC
Pot calling kettle.
You're no daisy
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:30 pm to Bankshot
quote:In a town smaller than Baton Rouge. . .which is also the largest "city" in Idaho.
People on here say no one of any real talent from the South wants to play in Starkville in front of 55K. Let's see Boise try to recruit the South with the promise of playing in front of 34K on blue turf in Idaho.
Trust me, I lived there for a couple years. Town sucks arse. It is like a slightly larger Denham Springs.
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho is where they have the annual National Skinhead/White Supremacist rally.
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:33 pm to LSUtoOmaha
quote:
I think they could go 5-3 in the SEC on a consistent basis. They would be an upper-tier team.
I agree.
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:36 pm to gatorprincess815
yeah, that same Arky that's played for the SEC title 3 times in 17 attempts, including twice against your team...
Posted on 9/4/09 at 12:47 pm to swampdawg
quote:
I think they could go 5-3 in the SEC on a consistent basis. They would be an upper-tier team.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree.
in the east or west? You think they will take the place of UGA, UF, Tenn?
Whcih teams have been consistent in the west? They gonna take the place of Bama, LSU, AU, even ark?
Posted on 9/4/09 at 1:01 pm to Cdawg
quote:
in the east or west? You think they will take the place of UGA, UF, Tenn?
Whcih teams have been consistent in the west? They gonna take the place of Bama, LSU, AU, even ark?
Good point. Consistency in the SEC is tough. I think that they could come in as a 4-4 team and after getting SEC recruits, could go 5-3 somemetimes.
Posted on 9/4/09 at 1:42 pm to swampdawg
One thing that I thought was interesting about the game last night. Apparently BSU is like 64-2 at home since 1999. In fact, they have the best home record in the FBS in that time frame. Sounds impressive doesn't it?
During the game, they did a trivia question which was "how many ranked opponents has BSU played at home during the regular season?" The answer was 1 (Oregon last night was the one and only ranked team they have ever played in Boise). No wonder the home record is so good.!!
During the game, they did a trivia question which was "how many ranked opponents has BSU played at home during the regular season?" The answer was 1 (Oregon last night was the one and only ranked team they have ever played in Boise). No wonder the home record is so good.!!
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News