Started By
Message
re: Bogus National Title claims: Alabama claims 18 but most are questionable
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:36 pm to Chicken
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:36 pm to Chicken
quote:
Following my sound logic, Notre Dame, which claims 11 national titles, has no legit titles
You should grant them the 1973 title. They were ranked #3 going in to the Sugar Bowl vs #1 Alabama,whom they beat 24-23. But keep in mind #2 Oklahoma was on probation an ineligible for a bowl.
1
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:38 pm to I-59 Tiger
quote:Nope...sorry...can't do it.
You should grant them the 1973 title. They were ranked #3 going in to the Sugar Bowl vs #1 Alabama,whom they beat 24-23. But keep in mind #2 Oklahoma was on probation an ineligible for a bowl.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:39 pm to Chicken
quote:
Chicken
Ladies and gentlemen, the Godfather himself.... Chicken is in the building.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:40 pm to Chicken
How was 1961 not legitimate for Alabama?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:41 pm to CapstoneGrad06
I was wondering this as well.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:42 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Because envious fans from other fanbases say so.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:42 pm to Chicken
Chicken, you math flatters Alabama more than any math our administration could possibly do. Thank you.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:47 pm to UAFanFromNOLA
Why doesn't 96 count for us? That was a title game for both teams at kickoff.
Edit: I meant to quote Chicken.
Edit: I meant to quote Chicken.
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:47 pm to CapstoneGrad06
In 1961, Bama did not play No. 2 Ohio State in bowl game...
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:49 pm to Chicken
So, can this thread get an anchor and die already?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:49 pm to Korin
quote:Florida was not No. 2 when you faced Florida State in the Sugar Bowl...
Why doesn't 96 count for us?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:51 pm to Chicken
So this is entirely based on games between #1 and #2, which would lead to the majority of seasons prior to 1992 not even having champions?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:52 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Basically.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:52 pm to CapstoneGrad06
now you are catching on.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:53 pm to Chicken
It's been over three years now, may you soon find the peace you so desperately seek.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:53 pm to Chicken
quote:
Florida was not No. 2 when you faced Florida State in the Sugar Bowl...
It was a title game for both teams. Keep on hating though.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:54 pm to Nado Jenkins83
I look forward to the future piece suggesting all non-playoff claims are invalid.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:55 pm to Chicken
So who won it in 1961 and 1996?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:59 pm to Carolina Tide
Using his logic, 03 doesn't count for LSU because their bowl game wasn't #1 vs. #2.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:00 pm to Chicken
Revisionist historians are also dicksuckers. FACT!!!
Page 21 of 121
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News