Started By
Message
Posted on 12/15/11 at 6:44 pm to JoshuaChamberlain
quote:
Like Selvin Young
That one worked well.
Posted on 12/15/11 at 6:45 pm to I Bleed Garnet
I only remember the name b/c I saw one of his football cards in my brother's collection the other day...he DID go to USC didn't he? Or no? I know Sidney Rice did (of course)...but pretty sure SY did too?
This post was edited on 12/15/11 at 6:47 pm
Posted on 12/15/11 at 6:48 pm to JoshuaChamberlain
Selvin Young went to Texas.
Sidney Rice did go to South Carolina.
Sidney Rice did go to South Carolina.
Posted on 12/15/11 at 6:49 pm to I Bleed Garnet
Dammmmmittttttttttt
Back to the beer fridge

Back to the beer fridge
Posted on 12/15/11 at 6:52 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
CFBFAN1121
I bet you were the star of your logics class.
Idiot.
Posted on 12/15/11 at 6:53 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
So did you also say Vince Young was a good QB too because he had a good rookie year
I'm not sure what my opinion of an individual player has to do with my opinion comparing two players.
Besides, I don't recall VY leading the league in any category like Tate has. YPC and runs for over 10 are very significant stats for RBs.
I'm just saying as of now, Tate may be getting the upper hand. Things could change in the future.

Posted on 12/15/11 at 6:56 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
Besides, I don't recall VY leading the league in any category like Tate has. YPC and runs for over 10 are very significant stats for RBs.
Just imagine if Tate didn't have Foster in front of him...
Posted on 12/15/11 at 6:56 pm to CFBFAN1121
It's a small sample set to really be comparing anything.
And VY lead the league in Rushing TDs by a QB, as well as won Rookie of the Year.
But hey if it pisses off Bammers I'm fine with it.
And VY lead the league in Rushing TDs by a QB, as well as won Rookie of the Year.
But hey if it pisses off Bammers I'm fine with it.
This post was edited on 12/15/11 at 6:58 pm
Posted on 12/15/11 at 7:01 pm to Unbiased Bama Fan
quote:
Unbiased Bama Fan
This username won't serve much purpose soon
Posted on 12/15/11 at 7:06 pm to TTsTowel
I said Ingram would be a bust before he was even drafted...Taints were dumber than the Falcons for giving up what they did for Julio.
Posted on 12/15/11 at 7:07 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
It's a small sample set to really be comparing anything.
Yeah, but if you simply use the eye test, Tate looks to be bigger, faster and more elusive than Ingram.
To be fair, Tate plays in a system where running the ball is a priority, Ingram doesn't.
Posted on 12/15/11 at 7:13 pm to CFBFAN1121
Tate has done very well. Ingram has done pretty well but he came into a situation with a starting running back already on the roster and an APB in Sproles coming in as well. The Saints have so many quality backs they use 4 of them and are in the top 10 in the league in rushing while being in the top 2 in passing. Ingram's personal numbers aren't stellar and Tate's numbers this year are certainly better, but one season does not a career make. I seem to remember a certain Shaun Alexander only rushing for 300 yards his rookie year and later being NFL MVP, so this is a debate that, if it continues, will take a while to settle. Both look like very good backs.
Posted on 12/15/11 at 7:18 pm to swordfishtrombone
Tate has done a great job, looks much better coming off that injury than I would have expected.
Posted on 12/15/11 at 7:21 pm to CFBFAN1121
Saints Offense > Texans Offense
Posted on 12/15/11 at 7:34 pm to fillmoregandt
TR3 > Tate > Ingram.
Posted on 12/15/11 at 7:36 pm to CFBFAN1121
I think national champion, heisman trophy winning Mark Ingram got the last laugh on that shite
Posted on 12/15/11 at 7:41 pm to CFBFAN1121
He's a running back, he'll be out of the league and ineffective in 5 years.
Posted on 12/15/11 at 7:48 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Hell, maybe he is.
Maybe? Tate is better.
quote:
But WHO THE frick CARES?
No one, its just killing time
quote:
It doesn't affect either Alabama or Auburn.
Should have affected the 1st Heisman winner at Alabama
Popular
Back to top
