Started By
Message
Posted on 8/18/11 at 4:31 pm to AUtigR24
quote:
Please tell me that isn't real
Oh it's real and it's fabulous
Minus the fabulous.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 4:31 pm to cjared036
I have to agree. It's the same way here. Ya they make cool golf shirts but they Generally Suck at making uniforms.
Auburn of course won't change a thing but UA has to come in and change one little thing to make it seem like they are right there with Nike in the Uniform Making business. Watch them try to pass this shite as some state of the art spandex pant system where they use less fabric and it provides greater mobility or some shite.
Stop with it ya'll will never catch up to Nike.
I wish we were Nike.
Auburn of course won't change a thing but UA has to come in and change one little thing to make it seem like they are right there with Nike in the Uniform Making business. Watch them try to pass this shite as some state of the art spandex pant system where they use less fabric and it provides greater mobility or some shite.
Stop with it ya'll will never catch up to Nike.
I wish we were Nike.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 4:35 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
Watch them try to pass this shite as some state of the art spandex pant system where they use less fabric and it provides greater mobility or some shite
Almost lol. theres a seem that goes where the stripe cut is and mobitily blah blah speed blah
quote:
I wish we were Nike.
Same.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 4:45 pm to McKeezy
Put me in the 'dont like it' camp.
I do like being an underarmor school though.
I do like being an underarmor school though.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 4:46 pm to McKeezy
Man and I was just saying the other day that Auburn had the one uniform that Under Armor couldn't find a way to frick up. 

Posted on 8/18/11 at 4:47 pm to TheCheshireHog
am i missing the big change? I'ts just the tip fo the stripe right. Also i've nver been a fan of names on the back of jerseys so if they want to make those even smaller i'm game.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 4:53 pm to piggidyphish
That's a pretty big change. And looks terrible.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 4:54 pm to bbap
Dude, no it isn't. I don't like it, but it isn't very noticeable.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 4:55 pm to piggidyphish
The stripe was a functional change more so than an aesthetic one. The old stripes you had 3 layers of material overlapping in an area that needs to bend. In the past more expensive uniforms had what is called an angle cut at the knee to try to eliminage this "bunching" of material and help with knee flexibility. By cutting the stripe the way they did you eliminate the bunching of material and you can take the thinner flexible lycra material past the bend on the knee which helps stabilize the knee pad over the knee more so than what a standard angle cut will give. It doesn't look as good but it's infinitly more comfortable than the old design and you get improved knee flexibility as well as knee pad stability.
War Eagle on the arse looks dumb though.
War Eagle on the arse looks dumb though.
This post was edited on 8/18/11 at 4:56 pm
Posted on 8/18/11 at 5:03 pm to TTsTowel
It's not noticeable that the stripe tapers to a point? I disagree. Very Texas techish.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 5:11 pm to LSUdm21
quote:
Did y'all seriously give yourselves tramp stamps???

I think the classic look is better.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 5:17 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
I wish we were Nike.
frick Nike.
Also, you forgot about the War Eagle and the 2 Stars on the jersey
Posted on 8/18/11 at 5:21 pm to McKeezy
As long as they don't mangle the helmet and the jersey and as long as the change is almost cosmetic, no big deal.
But any fundamental changes and I will personally kick Jay Jacobs and Jay Gogues gimlet asses.
But any fundamental changes and I will personally kick Jay Jacobs and Jay Gogues gimlet asses.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 5:25 pm to Lee County Tiger
What is this Soccer?
NIKE > UA
Except the Coaches Polos, UA makes them much better actually.
UA Sucks at making Basketball Uniforms though.
NIKE > UA
Except the Coaches Polos, UA makes them much better actually.
UA Sucks at making Basketball Uniforms though.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 5:26 pm to bbap
quote:
That's a pretty big change. And looks terrible
Going to go out on a limb here and suggest that we have different defintions of the word "big"
Posted on 8/18/11 at 5:26 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
NIKE > UA
I disagree. Nike apparel is made cheaper than UA apparel and doesn't last as long, plus it's made by 5 year olds in some sweatshop. Another reason I don't like them.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 5:30 pm to beatbammer
I also forgot, Nike tends to create a singular template and use it for multiple schools, thus losing any individuality that your uniform had.
UA does this as well, but no where near as bad as Nike does.
UA does this as well, but no where near as bad as Nike does.
Popular
Back to top
