Started By
Message
re: Auburn won't claim National Championships
Posted on 5/28/15 at 4:56 pm to ATLdawg25
Posted on 5/28/15 at 4:56 pm to ATLdawg25
Glad we're not trying that bullshite. Only gumps get their self-worth from ghost MNCs from teams they never played for from 75 years ago.
And frick you JJ for contemplating it.
And frick you JJ for contemplating it.
1
Posted on 5/28/15 at 5:01 pm to AU24
2004 13-0 no natty
1993 11-0 no natty
------Auburn Football-------
When your best just isn't good enough.
1993 11-0 no natty
------Auburn Football-------
When your best just isn't good enough.
Posted on 5/28/15 at 5:12 pm to Fireman17
quote:
In other news Bama just claim another NC
actually we claimed 2
Posted on 5/28/15 at 6:27 pm to Lordofwrath88
Careful, angry Arkansas and LSU fans will tell you how individual titles don't matter despite the fact that the NCAA awards hardware and keeps track of them. 
Posted on 5/28/15 at 7:22 pm to Korin
wouldn't they tell us they DO matter since they have oodles of track and field titles?
Posted on 5/28/15 at 7:27 pm to AU24
Didn't they get smashed at home by USC the previous year? And that was with an inexperienced Matt Leinart making his first career start too. USC would have killed them again in 2004.
Posted on 5/28/15 at 8:28 pm to AU24
quote:
Well if they would count National Championships the way Alabama does Auburn would have 9. That might be way they considered it.
If Auburn counted national championships the way that they want Alabama to count them, they wouldn't be able to count 1957. Auburn didn't even go to a bowl that year.
Posted on 5/28/15 at 9:19 pm to BamaNixon
As compared to bammer counting national championships in some years they lost bowl games if I remember correctly
Posted on 5/28/15 at 9:25 pm to auburnphan23
That's the point, dummy. Either non-Rose bowl wins before the late 60's are important or they aren't. If they are, then Auburn can't claim 1957. If they aren't, then Bama has every right to claim title where they lost the bowl game.
Posted on 5/28/15 at 9:29 pm to BamaNixon
Go frick yourself. You clowns claim championships 50 years after the fact, you claim them when you lose bowl games, and you even claim them when you finish in 3rd place in your own conference. You are the last fan base who should ever run your dick sucker about how anybody else claims championships
Posted on 5/28/15 at 9:30 pm to BamaNixon
AU is bamas daddy.
Posted on 5/28/15 at 9:33 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
Go frick yourself. You clowns claim championships 50 years after the fact, you claim them when you lose bowl games, and you even claim them when you finish in 3rd place in your own conference. You are the last fan base who should ever run your dick sucker about how anybody else claims championships
Posted on 5/28/15 at 9:35 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
Go frick yourself. You clowns claim championships 50 years after the fact, you claim them when you lose bowl games, and you even claim them when you finish in 3rd place in your own conference. You are the last fan base who should ever run your dick sucker about how anybody else claims championships
Blah blah. Quit thrashing about angrily and just decide whether or not those bowls count. Either way, it doesn't end well for Auburn.
Posted on 5/28/15 at 9:41 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
Go frick yourself. You clowns claim championships 50 years after the fact, you claim them when you lose bowl games, and you even claim them when you finish in 3rd place in your own conference. You are the last fan base who should ever run your dick sucker about how anybody else claims championships
It's just football, auNeck, quit taking it so seriously.
I don't understand why a fan of a team that has never really amounted to anything has much of a reason to become agitated anyway.
Posted on 5/28/15 at 9:43 pm to CtrlAltimerDelete
quote:says the gump who wrote the entire history of Alabama football in a message board post
quit taking it so seriously.
Posted on 5/28/15 at 9:47 pm to ChexMix
quote:
says the gump who wrote the entire history of Alabama football in a message board post
No, that was far from the entire history of Alabama football. If you want that, I'll deliver it in this thread.
Is that what you want?
Posted on 5/28/15 at 10:35 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
That's the point, dummy. Either non-Rose bowl wins before the late 60's are important or they aren't. If they are, then Auburn can't claim 1957. If they aren't, then Bama has every right to claim title where they lost the bowl game.
Posted on 5/28/15 at 10:36 pm to CtrlAltimerDelete
quote:
No, that was far from the entire history of Alabama football. If you want that, I'll deliver it in this thread. Is that what you want?
roll tide and all, but even I don't have time fo' dat.
Posted on 5/28/15 at 11:21 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Nobody wanted to see SC crush AU for a third consecutive year.
Posted on 5/28/15 at 11:24 pm to Lordofwrath88
quote:
wouldn't they tell us they DO matter since they have oodles of track and field titles?
No they always tell me the individual ones "don't matter" because UF has a lot more than both.
https://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/champs_records_book/Overall.pdf
Page 9 of 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News