Started By
Message
re: Auburn/Cam Newton recruiting violation
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:20 pm to NYCAuburn
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:20 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
And your long statement of facts isn’t correct either starting with Rogers. Being an ex player makes him a booster
Nope. Being a former player does NOT automatically make you a booster. The NCAA specifically held that Rogers was NOT a booster in the Newton Case. From the NCAA website (these same definitions were in effect in 2009):
"Boosters, referred to by the NCAA as “representatives of the institution’s athletic interests,” include anyone who has:
Provided a donation in order to obtain season tickets for any sport at the university.
Participated in or has been a member of an organization promoting the university’s athletics programs.
(Note by me....this means a booster club, not a sports team)
Made financial contributions to the athletic department or to a university booster organization.
Arranged for or provided employment for enrolled student-athletes.
Assisted or has been requested by university staff to assist in the recruitment of prospective student-athletes.
Assisted in providing benefits to enrolled student athletes or their families.
Been involved otherwise in promoting university athletics."
This post was edited on 7/7/18 at 2:22 pm
2
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:33 pm to Dday63
Here we are 10 years later and Cam Newton is still rustling jimmies... 
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:38 pm to JamalSanders
quote:
I know reading comprehension can be difficult for you leghumpers, but what Rabren actually said was that people assume Auburn cheated solely because State admitted to cheating.
Which has absolutely nothing to do with the OP. He was responding to the OP. You tell me who has a problem with reading comprehension.
The OP asks if it is a recruiting violation for Cam Newton to be in contact with recruits during their 7 v 7 tournament and Rabern responds by bringing up Cam Newton's recruitment?
Apparently both you and Rabern have reading comprehension problems.....and, apprently most Auburn fans in this thread, as none want to address the question.
However, in my response to the OP, I clearly addressed his question. It is not a recruiting violation.
So tell me. Do the people who cannot address the OP's question have a reading comprehension problem, or does the poster who actually answers his question have a reading comprehension problem?
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:40 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:
I mean Todd Gurley was there too recruiting for UGA.
If I’m mad about anything it’s that Cam lives 3 hours up 85 and can be more available in the state than most of our best NFL players
What kills me is a poster asks a simple recruiting question, and because Cam Newton was involved with the question all the Auburn fans automatically jump on Cam newton's recruitment. Seems some fan base is a bit triggered and sore about Cam's recruitment.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:41 pm to Pavoloco83
quote:
Here we are 10 years later and Cam Newton is still rustling jimmies
I don't give a spit about Cam, but if my jimmies have been rustled it is by the lies about State's actions in the matter being spread by the AU posters.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:42 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
What kills me is a poster asks a simple recruiting question, and because Cam Newton was involved with the question all the Auburn fans automatically jump on Cam newton's recruitment. Seems some fan base is a bit triggered and sore about Cam's recruitment.
You read and comprehend things in a funny way.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:43 pm to Tigerman97
quote:
Most NFL guys have little to no interest in giving back. The idea that several former players will starting mimicking Cam's 7on7 approach is laughable especially if you are talking about the best players.
I think they should, actually, and not for recruiting purposes, but for the reasons you stated. Give something back to the game and help some excellent players become better players.
My only complaint is that I wish more Georgia players would do the same.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:44 pm to BamaNatureBoy
Where ya been nature boy? We have missed your shite posts about Ole Miss.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:45 pm to Dday63
quote:
I don't give a spit about Cam, but if my jimmies have been rustled it is by the lies about State's actions in the matter being spread by the AU posters.
The Great Value Bulldogs were outbidded. Get over it
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:49 pm to Dday63
quote:
don't give a spit about Cam, but if my jimmies have been rustled it is by the lies about State's actions in the matter being spread by the AU posters
"Lies"
it's cute how y'all act so innocent. Y'all have been caught paying much lesser players than Cam since then but y'all still try and convince y'all selves that y'all aren't dirty af 
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:49 pm to Rabern57
Cool story. Link? Never heard State admit to any wrong doing but I have moved on.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 2:53 pm to Tigerman97
quote:
What kills me is a poster asks a simple recruiting question, and because Cam Newton was involved with the question all the Auburn fans automatically jump on Cam newton's recruitment. Seems some fan base is a bit triggered and sore about Cam's recruitment.
quote:
You read and comprehend things in a funny way.
Go back and read the OP, including the link. It clearly talks about Cam visiting recruits at a tournment, does it not? now go look at the Auburn fans responses.
First response: Tell bamascoop, and he will tell redfish, who will tell John Bonds, who will go on radio and claim MSU has nothing to do with it. I would love to live those days again.
You don't think this is referring to Cam newton's recruitment?
Second response: You wouldn't want the NCAA digging into the cam case. State already admitted they broke the rules and would be in trouble for sure out of the 2. Everything at Auburn was just assumed to have happened bc what State did.
Again, the Cam Newton recruitment, not what is in the OP.
Then it spirals out of control arguing about Cam newton's recruitment. How is that reading stuff in a funny way?
I am asking a serious question.
This post was edited on 7/7/18 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 7/7/18 at 3:27 pm to DawgsLife
Nobody wants to address my reading comprehension as opposed to Auburn fans reading comprehension? I didn't think so.
You Auburn fans might want to start reading the OP, including the link before running up to a ledge and jumping off.
You Auburn fans might want to start reading the OP, including the link before running up to a ledge and jumping off.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 4:34 pm to Dday63
quote:
I don't give a spit about Cam, but if my jimmies have been rustled it is by the lies about State's actions in the matter being spread by the AU posters.
Players get paid everywhere.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 4:45 pm to BowlJackson
quote:
"Lies" it's cute how y'all act so innocent. Y'all have been caught paying much lesser players than Cam since then but y'all still try and convince y'all selves that y'all aren't dirty af
And every time you get caught being wrong you just try to deflect.
quote:
1) nobody asked for money, State people offered money
You are dead wrong about this, and you know you are wrong. But we're supposed to be "acting all innocent".
Y'all get so upset when people claim Auburn paid Cam, because there is no evidence to prove the claim. But you can make statements about MSU that are directly contradicted by the evidence and admissions in the case, and somehow we're being sensitive?
Posted on 7/7/18 at 5:45 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Do the people who cannot address the OP's question have a reading comprehension problem, or does the poster who actually answers his question have a reading comprehension problem?
You made it out as if only Auburn fans went in that direction based on the OP...which was his intention.
The first two post are by an LSU fan and bama fan (who was notorious in the As the Plains Burn Thread) and both took the OP as trolling. The OP was not and is not concerned about a current violation.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 7:19 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
First response: Tell bamascoop, and he will tell redfish, who will tell John Bonds, who will go on radio and claim MSU has nothing to do with it. I would love to live those days again. You don't think this is referring to Cam newton's recruitment?
No, it is in reference to a MSU fan trying to make something out of nothing. The irony is it involves Cam again. I'm sure there are those same fans who are holding their breath and turning blue in hopes they can take down AU and Cam all at once.
Posted on 7/7/18 at 11:27 pm to Dday63
quote:
Dday63
It’s funny you continue to act like what you say is fact. A player is a booster. In all the simplified school versions they specifically state explayers are boosters
Also, Let’s go back to the last statement state reported in feb and two months later provided the info. So are you sticking to that as well?
quote:
Mississippi State said Wednesday it forwarded its recruiting information on Cam Newton to the SEC Office in January, but said it waited at least six months before fulfilling a request from the league office for more information.
So you are saying that your info is contradictory to known facts....
Your facts
quote:
Some serious misinformation. State did continue to recruit Newton, knowing that if they signed him they would have to declare him ineligible and report the incident. When he signed with Auburn, State waited two months before deciding they should report it to the SEC. The SEC asked for more info, and State took another two months to provide that to the SEC office, because reporting info on a student athlete at another school is not a high priority. State's reporting to the SEC was completed in May, 2010.
This post was edited on 7/7/18 at 11:31 pm
Posted on 7/8/18 at 7:17 am to Tigerman97
quote:
You made it out as if only Auburn fans went in that direction based on the OP...which was his intention.
It might be, but the OP clearly was not about the recruitment of Cam newton. It was Auburn fans who then went on the attack against MState about Cam Newton, when the OP had nothing to do with it. The State fans then responded.
Had Auburn fans looked at the link and responded to the question in the OP, this crapfest about Cam would not have started.
But, you think I have a reading comprehension. Again, I ask, in what way did my reading comprehension fail? You are one of the more reasonable posters for Auburn, so answer honestly.
My guess is the Auburn posters that responded assumed it was about the recruitment of Cam Newton and did not bother to look at the link to see what the OP was about.
You are right that the very first two posts were by LSU and Auburn fans that also did not look at the post/Link.
Does that excuse the Auburn posters who did the same, or does it just make all of them numbskulls?
But if Auburn posters want to be lumped in with people who you admit are trolls, that's fine with me. But my reading comprehension is just fine.
Posted on 7/8/18 at 7:19 am to Irons Puppet
quote:
No, it is in reference to a MSU fan trying to make something out of nothing. The irony is it involves Cam again. I'm sure there are those same fans who are holding their breath and turning blue in hopes they can take down AU and Cam all at once.
Personally, I can't imagine how this could be a recruiting violation, so it is a nonissue. The only reason it is an issue is because people did not read the link and overreacted by making false assumptions.
I've been guilty of the same in the past. but I admit it when I do it.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News