Started By
Message
At least next year, the argument will be a team with 2 or 3 losses
Posted on 12/4/23 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 12/4/23 at 4:39 pm
I think so anyway. Knowing the buffoons in the selection room, they would’ve had Florida State as the 9 seed and on the road.
5
Posted on 12/4/23 at 4:42 pm to BZ504
Teams will still get screwed.
Six highest ranked conf champs get automatic bids. Doesn't matter how many losses they have.
Six highest ranked conf champs get automatic bids. Doesn't matter how many losses they have.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 4:42 pm to BZ504
If their SOS is ranked 55th, with G5 teams playing a tougher schedule, I hope you’re right.
They don’t deserve shite.
They don’t deserve shite.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 4:46 pm to BZ504
quote:
I think so anyway. Knowing the buffoons in the selection room, they would’ve had Florida State as the 9 seed and on the road
After we got screwed out of a chance to play in 2004, I was all for a 4-team playoff because I thought never again would a 13-0 major conference champ get left out of a shot to play….. I was wrong.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 4:56 pm to BZ504
So you are saying LSU has an outside shot next year.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 5:22 pm to Night Vision
quote:
Six highest ranked conf champs get automatic bids
Changed to 5 to accommodate the death of the PAC 12
Posted on 12/4/23 at 5:59 pm to AUTiger789
The ACC can hardly be described as a major conference anymore. It’s been a long time since they’ve had multiple high quality teams in one year.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 6:06 pm to BZ504
The real arguments will be the seeding. Who gets the 4 byes and who goes on the road in Round 1. Who’s 12th, 13th, 14th won’t be nearly as impactful as the seedings of the top 3-9.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News