Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:37 pm to mrbroker
quote:
IF the NCAA is still investigating then TAMU has a lot to lose if they play JFF without him being cleared.
Nope. If A&M is able to show that they did their due diligence (and two internal investigations in five months shows that) and the NCAA cant show they knew he took money, it doesn't matter. It will go down just like the Dez Bryant situation, with either A&M getting evidence later and then suspending him or the NCAA ultimately doing it.
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:39 pm to Roger Klarvin
then TAMu will have to vacate all wins if they play a player who is ruled ineligible..please tell me again you are not this stupid..
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:40 pm to IT_Dawg
Yeah, that pretty much went out the window when it became public knowledge that the NCAA was directly and intentionally selling players' likenesses.
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:42 pm to mrbroker
quote:
then TAMu will have to vacate all wins if they play a player who is ruled ineligible
Again, nope. Dez Bryant played three games in 2009 while "ineligible", and after his suspension no wins were vacated by Oklahoma State.
In order to vacate a school's wins, the NCAA has to know that the school had direct knowledge of a player's lack of eligibility.
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:43 pm to Roger Klarvin
6 brokers, 4,400 autographs in 3 states in less than a month.
A&M will regret playing this kid if they decide to.
A&M will regret playing this kid if they decide to.
This post was edited on 8/12/13 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:44 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Yeah, that pretty much went out the window when it became public knowledge that the NCAA was directly and intentionally selling players' likenesses.
You sure about this? I thought it was still a possibility.
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:46 pm to AubieALUMdvm
Oh he gone
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:46 pm to Roger Klarvin
I won't reply to you again since you obviously are very myopic in your view. Great to be homer. :bang head:
Unless you are a lawyer or an insider with the TAMU folks making the decision then you are clueless.
Unless you are a lawyer or an insider with the TAMU folks making the decision then you are clueless.
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:47 pm to AubieALUMdvm
someone who has knowledge of the information said this was probably the violation that may be his downfall.
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:47 pm to mrbroker
I just provided you tangible past precedent that disproves your post and you bail out? 
This post was edited on 8/12/13 at 8:48 pm
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:49 pm to mrbroker
and multiple people from within the situation also think nothing is going to happen to him
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:50 pm to Roger Klarvin
not bailing out but you don't argue politics and religions with someone and in this case your mind is made up so it really does not matter..Let's revisit this situation in a couple of weeks if the NCAA has not made an official ruling.
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:52 pm to WestCoastAg
i never said whether it will or won't..My stance all along has been that if the NCAA has not cleared him by the start of the first game then TAMU would risk vacating games if they play him and then he is ruled to have violated his eligibility.
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:53 pm to mrbroker
you said
and thats what i was responding to
quote:
someone who has knowledge of the information said this was probably the violation that may be his downfall.
and thats what i was responding to
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:54 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Roger Klarvin
This post was edited on 8/12/13 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 8/12/13 at 8:56 pm to IT_Dawg
not sure how this theory by TAMU folks holds water.. So because the NCAA screwed up they are now going to be lax on student athletes who may have sold their signature for profit.
Posted on 8/12/13 at 9:00 pm to mrbroker
quote:
someone who has knowledge of the information said this was probably the violation that may be his downfall.
And pretty much everyone with local knowledge of the situation says nothing will happen at all.
Posted on 8/12/13 at 9:00 pm to Roger Klarvin
are you an insider or do you know the janitor who cleans out Sumlin's office and he is now your insider.
Posted on 8/12/13 at 9:01 pm to mrbroker
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
not bailing out but you don't argue politics and religions with someone and in this case your mind is made up so it really does not matter..
Make an argument that logically and legitimately counters mine and I'll consider changing my point.
As of yet, nobody on this board or in the media has done that.
Page 256 of 340
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News