Started By
Message
Arky entering SEC/Mizzou entering SEC
Posted on 9/2/12 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 9/2/12 at 9:57 pm
Arkansas came into the SEC from the SWC which was pretty much the Big 12 South having a 20-12 conference record for the 4 years before entering the SEC.
Missouri comes into the SEC from the Big 12 North with a similar conference record in 4 years of 22-12.
Arkansas went on to go 3-4 and 4-3 their first two seasons in the SEC. The wins in conference all came against losing teams by seasons end except for a quality win over #2 Bama in 93' and beating a 9-3 Tennessee team in 92'.
Will Mizzou make this a trend? Will they come from having a respectable record to being very average over the next few years.
Missouri comes into the SEC from the Big 12 North with a similar conference record in 4 years of 22-12.
Arkansas went on to go 3-4 and 4-3 their first two seasons in the SEC. The wins in conference all came against losing teams by seasons end except for a quality win over #2 Bama in 93' and beating a 9-3 Tennessee team in 92'.
Will Mizzou make this a trend? Will they come from having a respectable record to being very average over the next few years.
12
Posted on 9/2/12 at 9:58 pm to GaDog85
In before mizzousessed
Posted on 9/2/12 at 9:59 pm to GaDog85
Bookmarked for December 2013.
This thread will take some time to answer.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:02 pm to GaDog85
Is Georgia naturally obsessed with Mizzou, or is it because they know they are their only legitimate threat to the East?
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:03 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Mizzou
quote:
legitimate threat
Does not compute
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:04 pm to GaDog85
If the east had any decent teams, then probably so.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:05 pm to TeLeFaWx
They are our next opponent and a new SEC team. Is it not reasonable to see what kind of team they are?
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:06 pm to Sao
Ok, I'll bite. The similarities end with Mizzou beating SELA 62-10 in their first game after joining the SEC while Arkansas lost to the Citadel 3-10.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:12 pm to GaDog85
Arkansas sucked for a decade + in the SEC since they joined. Therefore, Mizzou and A&M will suck as well. 
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:12 pm to GaDog85
Arkansas is in the south. Missouri isn't.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:14 pm to wmr
Arkansas is like Oklahoma. You are not really sure what the frick they are.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:19 pm to Palooza11
Porkerface repping Mizzou's next opponent in his profiles's favorite team:
#patheticallyMizzousessed
#patheticallyMizzousessed
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:20 pm to GaDog85
quote:
Arkansas came into the SEC from the SWC which was pretty much the Big 12 South having a 20-12 conference record for the 4 years before entering the SEC.
Missouri comes into the SEC from the Big 12 North with a similar conference record in 4 years of 22-12.
This really isn't a very good comparison. The '90 and '91 Arkansas teams were probably the worst teams we had since the mid 50's. We came in to the SEC with a talent deficiency that we hadn't seen in forty years while Missouri is in the midst of their best run ever. I fully expect Missouri to be much better in their initial years that we were back in '92 and '93.
This post was edited on 9/2/12 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:21 pm to GaDog85
Arkansas prior 5 years before entering SEC
1991=6-6
1990=3-8
1989=10-2
1988=10-2
1987=9-4
Total=38-22
Winning %=.633
Missouri prior 5 years before entering SEC
2011=8-5
2010=10-3
2009=8-5
2008=10-4
2007=12-2
Total=48-19
Winning %=.716
I took 5 years as it seems a fair number for where the programs were at. I think overall they are very similar the last 2 years before entrance very much favor Mizzou.
1991=6-6
1990=3-8
1989=10-2
1988=10-2
1987=9-4
Total=38-22
Winning %=.633
Missouri prior 5 years before entering SEC
2011=8-5
2010=10-3
2009=8-5
2008=10-4
2007=12-2
Total=48-19
Winning %=.716
I took 5 years as it seems a fair number for where the programs were at. I think overall they are very similar the last 2 years before entrance very much favor Mizzou.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:22 pm to Palooza11
quote:
Arkansas sucked for a decade + in the SEC since they joined. Therefore, Mizzou and A&M will suck as well.
Someone needs to google Stoernover and recalculate
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:23 pm to Tackle74
We shouldn't be penalized just because we haven't had our best season in program history in the past 5 years. Misleading stats are misleading.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:25 pm to GaDog85
If you are asking if Mizzou will beat Bama, LSU, or Arkansas in the first 2 years, the answer is NO!
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:25 pm to Porker Face
quote:
We shouldn't be penalized just because we haven't had our best season in program history in the past 5 years. Misleading stats are misleading.
Once again your ignorance shows Mizzou's best years as a program were clearly in the 60's were they won more games then any team in the nation. You seriously are #mizzousessed
This post was edited on 9/2/12 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:25 pm to reedus23
quote:
reedus23
Arky entering SEC/Mizzou entering SEC
Ok, I'll bite. The similarities end with Mizzou beating SELA 62-10 in their first game after joining the SEC while Arkansas lost to the Citadel 3-10.
Well, with all do respect to Mizzou, SELA is no Citad.......oh wait. Nevermind.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 10:26 pm to Tackle74
quote:
Mizzou's best years as a program were clearly in the 60's
Oh the decade they won all those titles??
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News