Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:34 am to SidewalkTiger
WTF
Avoiding records over last three years to be above trolling but its going to get fun real quick.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:37 am to kilo
quote:
Who did that slow roster turnover benefit?
Schools that developed players. All levels.
Take lower tier schools. Back in the day if a school built up a dude for 3-4 years and made him a great player, they got the benefit of that player for 4th/5th year. Now that player transfers and ends up at a school like Alabama.
Higher tier schools could develop players also and keep them around until their final years.
Now development is lacking and the players are getting worse overall.
quote:
The schools with money
The schools with money have always been spending money on things like the best coaches, the best facilities, the best support systems, etc.
There has never in the history of the sport been a limit on spending. If you had it, you'd have already been spending it.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 12:38 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:43 am to kilo
quote:
WTF
Avoiding records over last three years to be above trolling but its going to get fun real quick.
What is the difference between that time period and now?
You were winning then and you're winning now, you actually sustained it for longer in that time period than you have so far current day.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:51 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
You were winning then and you're winning now, you actually sustained it for longer
Im not sure you want the comparison
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:53 am to kilo
Sure I do
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:22 am to SidewalkTiger
They may flip, but it won't be to Mizzou.
We'll $ee...
We'll $ee...
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:28 am to TampaTiger87
quote:
We'll $ee
$ome dont see it.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 1:29 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:30 am to kilo
I see you guys stacking those 20th ranked recruiting classes
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:39 am to kilo
Do any of you rather have the current situation with your football program right now with the NIL and the transfer portal rule change being setup? I do.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:41 am to kilo
$ome dont see it.
Francly, that's the Fr€nch in them, for better or wor$e. ¯\_(?)_/¯
Francly, that's the Fr€nch in them, for better or wor$e. ¯\_(?)_/¯
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:43 am to TrueLefty
quote:
Do any of you rather have the current situation with your football program right now with the NIL and the transfer portal rule change being setup? I do.
Absolutely.
Mizzou is killing it.
7-16 against the AP Top 25 and 1-9 vs. the AP Top 10.
nEw eRa
mUh bEsT niL iN tHe cOuNtRy
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:49 am to SidewalkTiger
Week 9
AP Top 25
LSU : also receiving votes
AP Top 25
LSU : also receiving votes
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:51 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Absolutely.
Mizzou is killing it.
7-16 against the AP Top 25 and 1-9 vs. the AP Top 10.
nEw eRa
mUh bEsT niL iN tHe cOuNtRy
Without it Mizzou would be unranked most years. So far Mizzou is playing as a top 20 ranked team and how did LSU do so far this year? Drinkwitz has improved the team's roster talent plus playing much like a top 20 team.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 1:54 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:54 am to kilo
If LSU played Mizzou's schedule, they'd win 10 games every year too.
LSU has faced the #10 SOS and has 3 losses, Mizzou has faced the #31 SOS and has 2 losses.
Poor Mizzou fans don't realize most of the reason for their "success" is the result of playing shitty opponents.
But when Mizzou plays "good teams", they're 7-16 against the AP Top 25 and 1-9 vs. the AP Top 10.
LSU has faced the #10 SOS and has 3 losses, Mizzou has faced the #31 SOS and has 2 losses.
Poor Mizzou fans don't realize most of the reason for their "success" is the result of playing shitty opponents.
But when Mizzou plays "good teams", they're 7-16 against the AP Top 25 and 1-9 vs. the AP Top 10.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 1:58 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Poor Mizzou fans don't realize most of the reason for their "success" is the result of playing shitty opponents.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:42 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
But when Mizzou plays "good teams", they're 7-16 against the AP Top 25 and 1-9 vs. the AP Top 10.
Do LSU
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:06 am to kilo
I would take the OC.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:15 am to kilo
quote:
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:24 am to 3down10
quote:
That has nothing to do with your NIL claim.
You do know those 'rankings' aren't the end all be all right?
Wins and losses as we all know is the end all be all.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News