Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:11 pm to kilo
quote:
Has everything to do with it.
No it doesn't, are you fricking retarded?
You've managed to get 2 5 stars in the past 3 years. Many teams do 2 and 3 times that many in a single year. LSU averages almost 2 per year.
If your NIL was great, you'd be bringing in top talent. You bring in 15-20 talent, and that's about the strength of your team also.
And we'll see, but I personally doubt you finish the current season ranked. You could have 2 more losses coming and you can't afford that many. You'll have to beat either A&M or Oklahoma(your best chance). But your best win is like South Carolina or Auburn.
I honestly can't see why you are talking shite about anything.
This post was edited on 10/29/25 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:18 pm to 3down10
quote:
are you fricking retarded?
No. I didn't disrespect you that way. You want to go down this route gump?
The "blue bloods" are petrified becasue the playing field is being leveled and its glorious.
Nothing is static, the trends are there whether you want to acknowledge them or not. LSU is the barometer.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:20 pm to SidewalkTiger
Tenn is lower than I expected
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:21 pm to kilo
quote:
The "blue bloods" are petrified becasue the playing field is being leveled and its glorious.
Such a dumb, emotional take.
You retards act like non elite programs have never had good years before.
Heck, Mizzou went to the SECCG twice long before NIL and the portal. I mean y'all were even in the natty conversation in 2007.
Now suddenly, everything has changed because y'all won some garnes vs weak schedules.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:29 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
You retards act like non elite programs have never had good years before.
Heck, Mizzou went to the SECCG twice long before NIL and the portal. I mean y'all were even in the natty conversation in 2007.
Now suddenly, everything has changed because y'all won some garnes vs weak schedules.
Maybe we should have joined the B1G
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:32 pm to kilo
quote:
No. I didn't disrespect you that way. You want to go down this route gump?
The "blue bloods" are petrified becasue the playing field is being leveled and its glorious.
Nothing is static, the trends are there whether you want to acknowledge them or not. LSU is the barometer.
I didn't force you to say dumb shite before, I'm not forcing you to continue it.
If you haven't figured it out yet, what's going to happen is the same thing that always happens - the rich are getting richer. You keep acting like Missouri is some big powerhouse now, and you are not. You started this season with 5 home games, and beat South Carolina and cupcakes.
You lost to Alabama, you lost to Vandy. You beat Auburn in 2OT.
What is anyone supposed to be fearful of?
And as far as Indiana, that kind of shite happens all the time and has forever. What usually happens is they lose their coaching staff to the bigger schools. In this case Indiana managed to retain theirs for now, that's the only thing unique about Indiana right now.
In truth, 3 out of the top5 in recruiting this year are blue bloods. USC, Alabama and Notre Dame.
Last year, 3 of the top5 in recruiting were blue bloods. Texas, Alabama and Ohio St.
2024, 3 of the top5 in recruiting were blue bloods. Alabama, Ohio St and Texas
2023, 3 of the top 5 in recruitng were blue bloods. Alabama, Texas and Ohio St.
And then even though Georgia isn't a blue blood, they are in the top5 for each others years as well. They were recruiting well before NIL, and they continue to do so.
Nothing is changing, you just have confirmation bias.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:41 pm to 3down10
Please use paragraphs, "retard"
It is, that's why you're in this thread. White knighting for LSU.
quote:
Nothing is changing
It is, that's why you're in this thread. White knighting for LSU.
This post was edited on 10/29/25 at 11:42 pm
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:45 pm to kilo
quote:
Please use paragraphs, "retard"
I did.
quote:
It is, that's why you're in this thread. White knighting for LSU.
I most certainly am not white knighting for LSU. You made a claim saying Missouri was one of the best NIL programs in the country. I checked to see if it has merit. It does not. You could have been talking about any team and I'd have pointed out you were full of it.
The entire thing about NIL is a myth for the most part. All that's going to happen at best is the bigger schools are just going to shift where they spend money. From facilities and so forth to NIL.
This post was edited on 10/29/25 at 11:46 pm
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:50 pm to 3down10
quote:
You made a claim saying Missouri was one of the best NIL programs in the country.
It is.
quote:
I checked to see if it has merit. It does not.
Where are the records for the LSU/Mizzou over the same 3 year frame?
quote:
All that's going to happen at best is the bigger schools are just going to shift where they spend money. From facilities and so forth to NIL.
Yeah, the bag men are gone now. Pretending that underhanded money wasn't being passed to recruits during the pre NIL era is about as disengenious as it comes.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:53 pm to kilo
quote:
Yeah, the bag men are gone now. Pretending that underhanded money wasn't being passed to recruits during the pre NIL era is about as disengenious as it comes.
Pretending your school didn't pay players before but suddenly does now that it's legal is more disingenuous.
Everyone cheated, and the ones who paid the most then are still paying the same now. It's why recruiting rankings still look the same.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 11:55 pm to kilo
quote:
It is.
So I guess you just spend a shite ton of money on 3 stars then.
quote:
Where are the records for the LSU/Mizzou over the same 3 year frame?
It doesn't matter. That has nothing to do with NIL. Recruiting rankings and the talent you bring in has to do with NIL.
quote:
Yeah, the bag men are gone now. Pretending that underhanded money wasn't being passed to recruits during the pre NIL era is about as disengenious as it comes.
So I guess schools like Alabama just wasted money on the best facilities, staff, stadium and everything else then right?
Nobody ever stopped Missouri from doing those things. Remove all money to players, tell me what it is that Missouri has to offer a kid that's better than what Alabama has to offer. The answer is - not a damn thing.
If kids were being paid, it sure as frick wasn't to get kids away from teams like Missouri.
This post was edited on 10/29/25 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:06 am to SidewalkTiger
Doesn’t matter if they flip to Mizzou, Bama or UTEP, ya’ll fricked for a while.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:08 am to EZOU
quote:
ya’ll fricked for a while.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:09 am to EZOU
quote:
Doesn’t matter if they flip to Mizzou, Bama or UTEP, ya’ll fricked for a while.
No one is "fricked for a while" with the portal, if you get the hire right.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:11 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
No one is "fricked for a while" with the portal, if you get the hire right.
So now you agree things have changed.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:14 am to kilo
quote:
So now you agree things have changed.
Absolutely.
A rebuild can be done in one or two offseasons now. And the top and bottom are closer now than they used to be.
But it hasn't changed to the point to where Mizzou is some powerhouse competing for natties now.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:19 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
But it hasn't changed to the point to where Mizzou is some powerhouse competing for natties now.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:21 am to kilo
quote:
So now you agree things have changed.
Schools are able to turn over roster faster now. I think sometimes too fast.
15 years ago people cried when Saban did it as "oversigning".
This is to the benefit of top schools.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:25 am to 3down10
quote:
Schools are able to turn over roster faster now. I think sometimes too fa
Who did that slow roster turnover benefit?
quote:
This is to the benefit of top schools.
The schools with money
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News