Started By
Message
re: Anonymous SEC coach rustles Bo Wallace's jimmies...
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:26 pm to gnarkill1529
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:26 pm to gnarkill1529
Oh my God you can't possibly be this fricking stupid
0
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:27 pm to bbeck
quote:.
AJ, Manziel and Murray are the clear cut top 3
It's a crapshoot after that
I can agree with this.
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:28 pm to UMRealist
Shaw is better...if you ole miss fans want to argue about it then have at it. your an impossible bunch 
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:30 pm to gnarkill1529
Because we are smarter than you and continually prove it? Yeah it must seem impossible to you.
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:34 pm to DMagic
whatever you think but doesn't get past the fact your jimmies are rustled. he is good but not as good as you and your brethren make him out to be 
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:35 pm to gnarkill1529
Maybe he's just better than you believe? 
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:37 pm to UMRealist
then he can show everyone this season
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:37 pm to gnarkill1529
So we are back to Jimmie rustling. My work here is done
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:26 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
Hang the 30 point banner!
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:29 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:
CoonassBulldog
Treadwell qualified and is on campus BTW Nostradamus
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:32 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Who is Bo wallace?
quote:
a below average SEC qb
This post was edited on 5/28/13 at 8:33 pm
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:38 pm to Henry Jones Jr
But, his sources...
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:38 pm to DCRebel
quote:
If 3,384 yards and 30 touchdowns of total offense on the season is "below average" then, shite, I'll fricking take below average.
Bo threw for 2,994 yards and had 22 tds to a 17 interceptions. That is the definition of below average. Not a bad quarterback or anything, but definitely a below average one. I would put Russell's STATS in the "average" qb range. (2,800, 24 tds, 10 ints.)
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:38 pm to MSUbulldogs03
Bro>>>>>>Statue Russell
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:39 pm to MSUbulldogs03
god damn boy you're stupid. Bo had a higher completion percentage and more yards too but that makes him worse? 41-24
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:52 pm to DMagic
quote:
Because we are smarter than you and continually prove it? Yeah it must seem impossible to you.
By your standards, Bo is better than Shaw because he has more TDs and more yards regardless of how many more turnovers Bo had. So what is your logic for Russell? Russell had more TD's, fewer TO's, nearly the same passing yards, but has a slightly worse completion percentage. How is Bo better than Russell?
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:53 pm to DMagic
Shaw is 27-3 or something as a starter. He hurt his own shoulder the first game of the year against Vanderbilt, just had surgery this off season. Most qb's have some sort of injury and are not 100% all year. As of now idk how bro>shaw... maybe garnet glasses idk...
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:55 pm to MSUbulldogs03
He's younger and had a hurt shoulder. He was also, according to your boy Coonass, playing with far inferior talent. Still Bo and TR's numbers are almost identical so let's look at H2H just to be sure
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:56 pm to gamecocks22
I didn't know he had surgery. What was his injury like?
Posted on 5/28/13 at 8:56 pm to DMagic
quote:
god damn boy you're stupid. Bo had a higher completion percentage and more yards too but that makes him worse?
Bo had 97 more yards than Russell. You're right that should automatically right him off as the better QB
. Yeah I think most people see you as the dumbass.
Page 9 of 16
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News