
Started By
Message
Aaron Murray’s week 11 QB rankings
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:52 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:52 am
Sellers moves up to number 1.
Trinidad still at number 2 is too high. He leads the country in turnovers and just got totally exposed by UGA thanks in part to Texas and Muschamp laying the initial groundwork for how to play D against him we just perfected that gameplan even more. How long are we going to let him coast on his previous season?
Gunner and Keelon tied at 3/4 seems right
Hilariously Arch is at 8. Hopefully he declares for the draft some team will likely take a 7th round flyer on him
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 9:54 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:35 am to Aggie in TN
It only goes to number 10 which is George Macintire so Marcel would be somewhere after him.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 10:36 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:37 am to td01241
quote:
Sellers moves up to number 1.
??
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:48 am to rolltide32
He has actually been insanely good the last 4 games.
QBR in each is
UF- 87.8
Tenn- 79.2
OU- 96.1
A&M- 78.0
All in wins. Season totals 2100 yards on 63% completion. 17 passing TDs with 7 Ints. 637 rushing yards for 6.1 YPC with 7 TDs rushing.
I think the top 3 should be him, Stockton, and Russel and you are splitting hairs a bit between the three statistically as theyre all very close.
Keelon has been a bit better as a passer than Sellers with 18/5 TD/INT ratio and a higher completion % but his rushing numbers are significantly worse with 276 yards and only 3.7 YPC just as an example.
QBR in each is
UF- 87.8
Tenn- 79.2
OU- 96.1
A&M- 78.0
All in wins. Season totals 2100 yards on 63% completion. 17 passing TDs with 7 Ints. 637 rushing yards for 6.1 YPC with 7 TDs rushing.
I think the top 3 should be him, Stockton, and Russel and you are splitting hairs a bit between the three statistically as theyre all very close.
Keelon has been a bit better as a passer than Sellers with 18/5 TD/INT ratio and a higher completion % but his rushing numbers are significantly worse with 276 yards and only 3.7 YPC just as an example.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:49 am to td01241
I’m no uat fan, but how do you not Russell as #1? Without him, DeFour would already have 4 losses.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:52 am to jvilletiger25
See my post right above you. I think you can make a totally reasonable argument for Keelon or Stockton at number 1 as well. Really its Sellers Russel and Gunner all pretty closely tied for number 1, depending on what exactly you value most out of your QB as theyre all pretty close stats wise
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:55 am to jvilletiger25
quote:
but how do you not Russell as #1? Without him, DeFour would already have 4 losses.
one thing has nothing to do with the other
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:56 am to td01241
Laugh at Arch but how many SEC QBs have as many wins against ranked teams as Arch ? Would be interesting to know.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:56 am to td01241
quote:
QBR in each is
UF- 87.8
Tenn- 79.2
OU- 96.1
A&M- 78.0 <----
A game in which he was hurt and could barely walk at times. He just refused to quit. Most people didn't see it because of Bama vs LSU.

This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 11:01 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:57 am to td01241
I think if coaches are drafting QBs almost everyone takes KR #1 although Stockton is absolutely perfect for what UGA wants to do from a system fit standpoint.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:59 am to tide06
Oh I totally agree on that.
Russell will have a higher NFL draft grade than Gunner when he leaves because he has to come back for at least one more year. Which is why I think it’s pretty possible Gunner returns for another year at UGA depending on his draft grade. Unless he gets a top 2 round grade (which he won’t imo) he probably comes back
Russell will have a higher NFL draft grade than Gunner when he leaves because he has to come back for at least one more year. Which is why I think it’s pretty possible Gunner returns for another year at UGA depending on his draft grade. Unless he gets a top 2 round grade (which he won’t imo) he probably comes back
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 11:02 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:02 am to td01241
quote:
Oh I totally agree on that.
I don't.
Sellers is drafted above both just based on his Size (6'3" 240") and his 4.4ish 40 time. Both are better measurables that KR.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 11:06 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:03 am to Lonnie Utah
Again, I agree I think with you.
We were only talking about NFL grades on KR and Stockton comparatively.
Including sellers I think the nfl would see them in this order
Sellers
KR
Stockton
We were only talking about NFL grades on KR and Stockton comparatively.
Including sellers I think the nfl would see them in this order
Sellers
KR
Stockton
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:10 am to Old1937
quote:
Laugh at Arch but how many SEC QBs have as many wins against ranked teams as Arch ? Would be interesting to know
I was being a bit tongue in cheek.
Arch being 8th makes sense when taking his season in total, but he has been the best version of himself in his most recent games. The game against Mizzou was probably the best game I’ve seen him have in a Texas uniform
Posted on 11/9/26 at 12:17 pm to td01241
Against the 4 ranked opponents Texas has beat (OSU, Tenn, Ole Miss, Mizzou), all 4 QB's were "ranked" higher than Arch.
Arch: 83-124 (67%), 5 TD, 4 Int, 905 yds, 7.3 yds/att. (Texas passed on 45% of plays)
Opp: 83-160 (52%), 6 TD, 4 Int, 931 yds, 5.8 yds/att. (Opps passed on 55% of plays)
Both have the same number of completions; The 4 opponents have 36 more attempts.
Only Tennessee has passed less than 50% of their plays, but they were sacked 10 times.
Texas is run first, not a pass happy team, and has 8 rushing TD, the opponents have 1. Texas has out rushed the opponents 167 to 121 yds/game.
Against Mizzou, Texas was w/o T1 (Goosby), WR1 (Coleman), RB1 (Smothers).
Arch: 83-124 (67%), 5 TD, 4 Int, 905 yds, 7.3 yds/att. (Texas passed on 45% of plays)
Opp: 83-160 (52%), 6 TD, 4 Int, 931 yds, 5.8 yds/att. (Opps passed on 55% of plays)
Both have the same number of completions; The 4 opponents have 36 more attempts.
Only Tennessee has passed less than 50% of their plays, but they were sacked 10 times.
Texas is run first, not a pass happy team, and has 8 rushing TD, the opponents have 1. Texas has out rushed the opponents 167 to 121 yds/game.
Against Mizzou, Texas was w/o T1 (Goosby), WR1 (Coleman), RB1 (Smothers).
Posted on 11/9/26 at 1:06 pm to Ptins944
Cool write up.
Most of it if not all of it is basically totally irrelevant to this thread though.
For some reason you’re choosing to compare QBs against Arch in games they played head to head, rather than looking at a QBs entire seasons worth of body of work and merit.
It is an extremely twisted and contorted view of trying to gas up Arch, and it doesn’t even do the job well at all. There are a number of reasons for this but one of the biggest is that Texas has one of the best defenses in the country, so you’re baking into your very very very odd way of trying to make Archie look better a massive handicap against other QBs who unless they also play UGA or maybe Indiana are playing the best defense they will see all year by far, whereas arch is getting to play against one of the worst defenses in the country in one of your 4 cherry picked teams (ole miss,) a defense that has proven over the season it is a at worse than expected (Ohio state,) a defense that is middle of the road in the SEC (Mizzou) and one good defense you chose to include (Tennessee)
You went through all of this effort for no reason, or worse a dumb one. The SEC has a bunch of very good QBs in it this year.
Instead of making one of the weirdest arguments as a justification I have ever seen; watch the video and explain why he should be above any of the 7 QBs ahead of him based on his seasons body of work. And I just made a post before yours acknowledging Arch has gotten markedly better recently than he was early in the year and probably just played his best game I’ve seen him have at Texas against Zou
Most of it if not all of it is basically totally irrelevant to this thread though.
For some reason you’re choosing to compare QBs against Arch in games they played head to head, rather than looking at a QBs entire seasons worth of body of work and merit.
It is an extremely twisted and contorted view of trying to gas up Arch, and it doesn’t even do the job well at all. There are a number of reasons for this but one of the biggest is that Texas has one of the best defenses in the country, so you’re baking into your very very very odd way of trying to make Archie look better a massive handicap against other QBs who unless they also play UGA or maybe Indiana are playing the best defense they will see all year by far, whereas arch is getting to play against one of the worst defenses in the country in one of your 4 cherry picked teams (ole miss,) a defense that has proven over the season it is a at worse than expected (Ohio state,) a defense that is middle of the road in the SEC (Mizzou) and one good defense you chose to include (Tennessee)
You went through all of this effort for no reason, or worse a dumb one. The SEC has a bunch of very good QBs in it this year.
Instead of making one of the weirdest arguments as a justification I have ever seen; watch the video and explain why he should be above any of the 7 QBs ahead of him based on his seasons body of work. And I just made a post before yours acknowledging Arch has gotten markedly better recently than he was early in the year and probably just played his best game I’ve seen him have at Texas against Zou

Popular
Back to top
6









