Started By
Message
re: 5* WR Demteris Robertson (transfer from Cal) ruled eligible to play for UGA this season
Posted on 8/11/18 at 6:17 pm to DirtyDawg
Posted on 8/11/18 at 6:17 pm to DirtyDawg
quote:
And Princeton has 28 national titles. No one cares about National titles from when maybe 30 programs played.
Has Princeton, like GT, also won a natty more recently than UGA? That's new information
1
Posted on 8/11/18 at 6:20 pm to Sun God
I couldn't find either title on the AP website for Tech.
Posted on 8/11/18 at 6:22 pm to meansonny
Hmm I couldn't find a coaches' poll title for UGA since 1980
Posted on 8/11/18 at 6:25 pm to DirtyDawg
quote:
Illness in the immediate family. Better for him to move back close to home and try to continue to play.
This is what I don’t get. Auburn had a safety (Khari Harding)transfer to Tulsa because his dad was diagnosed with cancer and his appeal was denied. So, is there a continuity in their decisions at all?
Posted on 8/11/18 at 6:36 pm to Sun God
I can’t find info on LSU football pre 2000 or post 2011.
Have y’all disbanded the program?
Have y’all disbanded the program?
Posted on 8/11/18 at 6:46 pm to jangalang
The NCAA is typically very inconsistent with their rulings on these appeals. I think Robertson won this one since he missed all of last season to a medical redshirt. They don’t want a kid to have to sit for two seasons straight just cause he wanted to be closer to his dying mother.
Posted on 8/11/18 at 7:36 pm to DirtyDawg
Princeton isn’t FBS dumb arse.
Posted on 8/11/18 at 7:52 pm to jj06
quote:
Tech was decent in the mid 90s..
do we really want to bring up UGA's record in the 90s?
Wrong. Tech was terrible in the mid 90’s. Couldn’t even beat Ray Goff
Posted on 8/11/18 at 7:54 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
That whole attend Cal strictly for the academics thing worked great.
Might be the same thing that happened to Kaho. He didn’t meet the eligibility requirements for Washington and was going to have to sit a year and join team next year.
Posted on 8/11/18 at 7:55 pm to labamafan
Never mind just saw why he transferred.
Posted on 8/11/18 at 8:20 pm to Sun God
quote:
Hmm I couldn't find a coaches' poll title for UGA since 1980
You missed the one that was awarded to UGA in 1981. You couldn't even make it 1 year from your search date.
Posted on 8/11/18 at 9:43 pm to jj06
There was no such thing as the FBS back when their’s and half of Tech’s titles were “awarded” fricking dumbass.
Shocker. A Tech fan doesn’t know football.
Shocker. A Tech fan doesn’t know football.
Posted on 8/11/18 at 10:08 pm to DirtyDawg
Techies have been so quiet recently. It’s gonna get worse over the next few years.
Posted on 8/11/18 at 10:26 pm to DirtyDawg
quote:
I can’t find info on LSU football pre 2000 or post 2011
Weird timeframe to leave out
Coaches poll shows LSU at 1 a good 23 and 27 years after UGA
Huh.
This post was edited on 8/11/18 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 8/11/18 at 10:34 pm to Sun God
Congrats on getting lucky in the aughts lsu. Game is way over.
Posted on 8/11/18 at 10:36 pm to djsdawg
Y'all might win one. We already won two 
Posted on 8/11/18 at 10:39 pm to Sun God
All we need is luck
Posted on 8/11/18 at 10:42 pm to djsdawg
I think Smart is gonna get y'all one.
After this year of course
After this year of course
Posted on 8/12/18 at 11:18 am to Sun God
quote:
We already won two
Congratulations LSU. You won a Natty over a decade ago. Sorry bout that.
Posted on 8/12/18 at 11:22 am to jj06
quote:
I keep getting banned from Stingtalk for telling the truth about why we suck in recruiting.
Speaking of Stingtalk, you guys actually think you have a chance at Clemson
"You know they say that all teams are created equal, but you look at this offense, you look at our defense and you can see that statement just isn’t true. Two separate studies from the Georgia Tech Research institute and MIT independently found that in a normal game, any team has a 50/50 chance of winning. Factor in that we have an offensive genius and the team's production metrics are above average. Statistically, Clemson has a 25% chance, at best, to beat us. Factor in Coach Woody and Clemson’s chance of winning decrease to 12.5%
So, the data scientists took their 12.5% chance, deducted our 75% chance of winning, resulting in Clemson’s negative 62.5% chance of winning. They compiled our 75% chance of winning with our extra 50% chance of winning and they found we have a 137.50 % chance of winning. Seniòr Tiger, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for DRad in 2018."
Page 5 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News