re: 2014 Conference Schedule: No More Band Aid?

quote:

---

ETA: it's laughable that you posters say I'm whining. All I've done is post the schedules. I guess stating facts is whining.

---

I guess we are just being GUNTS in the face of your GENETICALLY SUPERIOR APEX PREDATORNESS.

Once a GUNT, always a GUNT, amirite?

quote:

---

Of course they have something to do with rotations, you really are not very bright. Why the bridge schedules, to het the rotations on track again with the new additions to the.SEC

---

The rotation had shite to do with the 2012 & 2013 BRIDGE SCHEDULE. sorry you're wrong.

quote:

---

Wait... so you care more about our strength of schedule than you do about whether or not your team beats us?

---

You gumps are stupid. Bama had one damn year of bye weeks before their games and every single Bama fan cried like a bitch.

If you think it's fair for Bama to play 4 of the top 5 SEC teams and LSU to play 2 of the top 5 SEC teams, then you're just as stupid. Scheduling inequality is real. Sorry. After next year LSU will have played USC-1 , UF-3 , UGA-1. WHILE IN THAT SAME PERIOD , BAMA HAS PLAYED , USC-0, UF-1, UGA-0( regular season). If you think that is fair, you're a dumb arse.

quote:

---

The UGA fans I'm friends with don't seem to understand this either.

---

The gumps are bad about it. If in a 3 year period LSU had played USC , UF ,& UGA A COMBINED TOTAL OF ONCE, I'm sure I might like it too. All while our biggest obstacle for the west title played them a combined total of 5 times.

Just a bit.

oh yeah.
DERRICK THOMAS. 2nd greatest lb ever.

If I may interject for a moment. Has Bama's schedule been easy the last couple years, yes. My point is, LSU had a chance to win the title and lost. LSU went undefeated that year with one of the most difficult schedules in history and still went undefeated. They had a chance to win the crystal and blew it, Bama's schedule had nothing to do with that. I like playing Florida every year and could really care less about who anybody else plays. Better games equal higher TV ratings which in turn equal more exposure. Point is, take care of business and it usually works out.

quote:

---

Talk about an embarrassment to a fanbase.

---

Bruh, ill headbutt you into a fricking coma. Go eat a stationwagon full of dicks, boy.

Your whining is noted.

Why should I have known a/b Bama/UT? UT has been down awhile, before that Bama was down (the game has featured both teams ranked only twice since 1999). I'm fairly young, and I know NOW that the rivalry had some significance in the 90's on back, but as someone who went to school recently LSU is who I would consider Bama's other rival just based on general media coverage.

quote:

---

LSU has to decide which battle is more important, Bama's weak SOS or playing UF

---

I'm not sure I understand the distinction

Bama's SOS has been weaker than LSU's because Bama plays Tenn while LSU plays Florida.

I like playing Florida FWIW but the expansion of the SEC has made for some difficult issues. If Tennessee and Georgia only have a game to rotate it will take 12 years for them to play a home and away with everyone else from the Western Division. That means everyone else gets more Kentucky and Vanderbilt instead of more games of national interest.