Started By
Message
re: 2013 SEC FB Champion if we hadn't expanded?
Posted on 3/3/14 at 6:23 pm to KSGamecock
Posted on 3/3/14 at 6:23 pm to KSGamecock
Was Murray's leg gonna miraculously heal in a week?
0
Posted on 3/3/14 at 7:12 pm to KSGamecock
quote:
Would Auburn still have won?
Unfortunately yes
Posted on 3/3/14 at 7:15 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
No, that was Marquez North
Posted on 3/3/14 at 7:29 pm to KSGamecock
Under your scenario, Nebraska didn't leave for the Big 10 and Colorado didn't leave for the PAC 12.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:29 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Todd Grantham was our DC. Murray's knee was inexistent.
Auburn still 2013 SEC Champs.
Auburn still 2013 SEC Champs.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:30 pm to AuburnTigers
bama fans be like
This post was edited on 3/3/14 at 8:31 pm
Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:40 pm to allVOLyall
If no expansion, then no bridge schedules in 2012-2013. To determine who would have won the SEC title, you'd have to reconstruct each team's schedule.
This post was edited on 3/3/14 at 8:41 pm
Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:56 pm to Weagle25
OP, what in god's name are you blathering about? 
Same, I like this kid.
quote:
I respect the hell out of Murray. That game is a perfect example of why
Same, I like this kid.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:39 pm to Ross
quote:
To my dying breath I'll say Murray didn't cross the goal line on that last TD, but win or lose he played like a champion in that game.
I, for one, will never understand how Auburn guys saw no evidence of Murray scoring on that play; but are perfectly fine with glossing over a butt recovering a fumble two quarters prior.
However, having said that; there was no way that UGA would have been in the game with Auburn in Atl. After that Iron Bowl, there was no slowing down Auburn riding on that high. I just hate that Aaron Murray's entire UGA career was mired in the Grantham reign of defensive mediocrity.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:45 pm to JStanDawgFan
There wasn't enough evidence either way (although I biasly think there was more evidence showing he didnt cross)
Had it been called no-TD, it would have stood as well IMO.
shite happens, its football. Auburn got the benefit of the doubt in a similar call in the 2010 season IIRC against arky, difference being there was no PIJH for the pigs.
Had it been called no-TD, it would have stood as well IMO.
shite happens, its football. Auburn got the benefit of the doubt in a similar call in the 2010 season IIRC against arky, difference being there was no PIJH for the pigs.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:56 pm to Tiguar
quote:
Tiguar
My point exactly. They were both 50/50 calls that could have gone either way. Bias dictates how anyone would feel about how either one was called, but fans cannot be so sure about the more prominent one that did not go their way, all while neglecting the one that did. Its fandom at its most basic, I suppose.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 10:01 pm to JStanDawgFan
Yes. I will still argue in other, less civil, moments that I was on the goal line and can say with 100% certainty that Murray did NOT cross 
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News