Started By
Message
2004 AU VS 2003 LSU
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:40 am
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:40 am
Who would win this match up and why?
Which season would you rather have undefeated sugarbowl champions or 1 loss National champions.
I think 2003 LSU would win personally, but I would rather go undefeated than have a loss and a token trophy.
Which season would you rather have undefeated sugarbowl champions or 1 loss National champions.
I think 2003 LSU would win personally, but I would rather go undefeated than have a loss and a token trophy.
8
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:42 am to BhamDore
I guarantee you that everyone is going to pick a one loss NC season because that is the corret answer. I think it would be a close game between the two though, and I dont really see any reasons to pick one over the other.
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:42 am to Funky Tide 8
2003 LSU. Superior offense and a better defense.
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:43 am to RollTide1987
Really you would pick a loss over a perfect season just because of a trophy.
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:45 am to BhamDore
quote:
Really you would pick a loss over a perfect season just because of a trophy.
you ask this like its a ridiculous answer.
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:46 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
because that is the corret answer
It may be the corret answer, but it's not quite the correct answer
2004 AU: 4-1st rounders and if Tuberville wasn't so damn conservative, we would have blown out 70% of our schedule
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:50 am to BhamDore
quote:
Really you would pick a loss over a perfect season just because of a trophy.
I think that most people would.
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:51 am to BhamDore
2003 - Saban coaching /thread
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:52 am to rbWarEagle
So LSU 2001 team is more impressive than Bama's 08 team because LSU won the SECG, but lost plenty of other games. Bama went 12-0 then lost in ATL, but because LSU won the hardware they had a better season?
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:53 am to rbWarEagle
quote:
2004 AU: 4-1st rounders and if Tuberville wasn't so damn conservative, we would have blown out 70% of our schedule
So just because Auburn had 4 1st rounders that automatically makes them the better team? If all things were equal, would you take 2004 Auburn over a team like 1995 Nebraska? They didn't have four 1st rounders but they sure as hell could kick any team's arse.
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:53 am to BhamDore
quote:
Really you would pick a loss over a perfect season just because of a trophy
Crystal football >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some tacky People's Champion ring.
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:54 am to BhamDore
quote:
So LSU 2001 team is more impressive than Bama's 08 team because LSU won the SECG, but lost plenty of other games. Bama went 12-0 then lost in ATL, but because LSU won the hardware they had a better season?
I wasn't aware Vandy fan was allowed to be this dumb.
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:54 am to BhamDore
quote:
So LSU 2001 team is more impressive than Bama's 08 team because LSU won the SECG, but lost plenty of other games. Bama went 12-0 then lost in ATL, but because LSU won the hardware they had a better season?
W-L wise there isn't that much difference between 12-2 and 10-3. And yes, they had the better season because they actually won something. What did 2008 Alabama win besides 12 games?
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:55 am to Robot Santa
Alabama has the most undefeated untied season of all-time so I figured the gumps would value a perfect season more than some split championship.
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:56 am to BhamDore
Championships separate good seasons from great seasons.
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:56 am to BhamDore
quote:
I figured the gumps would value a perfect season more than some split championship.
Tell me, how does that self-given, zero loss trophy compare in a trophy case to a crystal football?
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:56 am to BhamDore
quote:
Alabama has the most undefeated untied season of all-time so I figured the gumps would value a perfect season more than some split championship.
A perfect regular season doesn't mean as much as winning championships.
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:57 am to CRAZY 4 LSU
There is no better season than a perfect one.
Posted on 4/10/10 at 11:57 am to RollTide1987
quote:
So just because Auburn had 4 1st rounders that automatically makes them the better team?
No, but it helps when your entire backfield goes in the first round.
quote:
If all things were equal, would you take 2004 Auburn over a team like 1995 Nebraska? They didn't have four 1st rounders but they sure as hell could kick any team's arse.
No. But I'd take 2004 AU over 2003 LSU.
This post was edited on 4/10/10 at 12:02 pm
Page 1 of 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News