Started By
Message

2004 Alabama vs. Auburn Highlights

Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:45 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65009 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:45 pm
While Auburn won the game, there are those out there who believe the Tigers' lackluster performance in the first half cost them a possible berth in the BCS title game.

LINK
Posted by tilco
Spanish Fort, AL
Member since Nov 2013
13475 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:50 pm to
Not the reason....just a convenient excuse for the talking heads to justify keeping Oklahoma in the 2 slot.
Posted by DesignTiger
Buford, Georgia
Member since Jun 2011
1518 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

Auburn won
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79143 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:53 pm to
Didn't Kirk claim if we beat what was like the 6th ranked UGA team at the time, he'd move us to 2nd?

Then we win in what was a dominating performance, and he backed out?

Posted by TheJones
Member since Nov 2009
33324 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:54 pm to
Auburn wouldn't have beat USC anyway, if we're being honest.
Posted by allin2010
Auburn
Member since Aug 2011
18151 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Auburn wouldn't have beat USC anyway, if we're being honest.

We would have been underdogs for sure... but that Auburn team was loaded and may have found a way.

Still the highest ranked AP team that year and the best Auburn team ever.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79143 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

Auburn wouldn't have beat USC anyway, if we're being honest.



Doubtful, but we would have beaten Oklahoma by a couple TDs
Posted by gatortrav88
Member since Oct 2014
3807 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:57 pm to
yea gotta agree

that team might make a top 5 of all time team lists
Posted by LSU_Anthony
Houston, TX
Member since Jul 2015
315 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:59 pm to
Matt Leinart and Reggie Bush
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

there are those out there who believe the Tigers' lackluster performance in the first half cost them a possible berth in the BCS title game.



I think those people are lying to themselves.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65009 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

that team might make a top 5 of all time team lists


Their non-conference opponents finished with a losing record. And while Auburn did beat some great teams in the SEC that year, the SEC as a whole was very top heavy. Beyond Auburn, Georgia, LSU, and (to a lesser extent) Tennessee, the SEC sucked in '04.

7 of the 12 teams in the conference won 6 or fewer games that season. Only two teams in the SEC West finished above .500.

This post was edited on 8/27/15 at 4:10 pm
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
18306 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 4:15 pm to
Auburn would have given USC hell. Oklahoma secondary was garbage that year. Auburn had better talent. Reggie McNeil literally broke his arm after throwing so many touchdowns on Oklahoma secondary. USC struggle with bad teams that year like UCLA.

Tuberville playing it safe against vtech cost him. I wonder if Brandon Jacobs was still with auburn would those FGs turned into touchdowns.
This post was edited on 8/27/15 at 4:19 pm
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 4:27 pm to
Spencer Pennington.



Forgot how wide open Keith Brown was on that first series.


Tyrone Prothro
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 4:36 pm to
It was actually because Oklahoma stole our game against a good Bowling Green team and left us with the fricking Citadel
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

Auburn wouldn't have beat USC anyway, if we're being honest.


Why not? In retrospect we now know that Auburn had more and better NFL talent than USC who was supposed to be tGOAT
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 4:46 pm to
That AU team was great and talented, but I don't think Tuberville's coaching style would have matched up well with USC and Carrol's. That USC team was insanely talented as well.


We'll never know. It would have been a good game.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38012 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

Not the reason....just a convenient excuse for the talking heads to justify keeping Oklahoma in the 2 slot.


This.

There wasn't a goddam thing Auburn could have done to convince the voters who self-justified their votes for USC #1 and Oklahoma #2 from before the season even started to change their minds. Wasn't gonna happen.

It should have though.
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
18306 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 5:11 pm to
Campbell mobility would've kept usc off guard. The best way to attack auburn was to run straight at them. UT finally figured that out in 2 nd half of title game. Not sure usc would have patience to do that.
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30827 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 5:14 pm to
I'd love to know the ages of people posting in this thread. 2004 is the most hilarious example of revisionist history I've ever seen. It's truly amazing how easily the media is able to manipulate morons.
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 5:50 pm to
Personally, I think getting our shite pushed in by USC two years in a row the years prior is what REALLY did us in. Choice between undefeated SC and undefeated AU, when SC beat us twice H2H, I think that did it.

I loved the 2004 iron bowl. Croyle is still picking grass out of his hair...
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter