Started By
Message

Saw Eddy Lacy around campus an hour ago...
Posted on 10/23/10 at 12:25 am
Posted on 10/23/10 at 12:25 am
which means he didnt make the travel squad to Tennessee...
I don't know if Goode made it, but I do see this as a sign that we intend to throw and throw and throw some more...which could turn out well, but the last two weeks was solidly unstellar.
or
Or yeah...I'll just
and pass out
I don't know if Goode made it, but I do see this as a sign that we intend to throw and throw and throw some more...which could turn out well, but the last two weeks was solidly unstellar.
Posted on 10/23/10 at 12:43 am to BamaDixi
Can't use Tennessee as a barometer for the passing game. It's Tennessee.
Posted on 10/23/10 at 12:43 am to BamaDixi
He's been dinged up. Fowler may be third string at this point.
Posted on 10/23/10 at 12:46 am to BamaDixi
He is hurt, was in a black jersey all week.
Posted on 10/23/10 at 1:01 am to bona fide
And why are people so fascinated by this guy? If he's our future at RB, we're screwed... royally!
Posted on 10/23/10 at 1:24 am to BradPitt
quote:
And why are people so fascinated by this guy? If he's our future at RB, we're screwed... royally!
This. I think some were excited because he was a 4* RB from LA along Sentimore & Green. I think some fans feel like they need to have good careers at UAt to justify getting future out of LA which is retarded. Not every kid in LA wants to attend LSU. We will lose a few but it doesn't mean that if you recruit OOS kids that you have to find a way to play them. It's up to the individual himself to get playing time, not the fans or the coaches.
Same as case with Phelon, we recruited him but would have rarely seen the field at LSU. I am happy for him that he fits the scheme in Bama better but he's still no starter. I wish all former LA kids the best of luck when they go OOS but those schools don't owe them anything other than an education. Same goes with out athletes.
Posted on 10/23/10 at 1:28 am to TheoreticalTiger
Lacy is legit, just in a crowded situation
Posted on 10/23/10 at 1:55 am to tduecen
quote:
Lacy is legit, just in a crowded situation
No question about it. The fact is with 85 scholly players allowing 3 deep personal at each position means somebody has to get screwed. This year, it's Lacy. Although, I didn't like the way Davis handled his recruitment I am still happy to see him get significant playing time in his Sr year.
We have several high profile players including a 5* athlete from Ohio riding the pine because of our depth also. He will be good in the future but he's not guaranteed to play unless he's worthy of beating out those in front of him.
Posted on 10/23/10 at 2:09 am to tduecen
quote:
Lacy is legit, just in a crowded situation
Ingram showed pro-style potential in his first year playing, as did Richardson.
What has Lacey showed us? He's undersized. He's not physical. He has ball security issues. Again, he has ball security issues. He's far from versatile. He can't break tackles. He can't break a significantly big run. He has ball security issues. He's not very fast. And did I mention he has ball security issues?
I have nothing against the dude, it's just I'm tired of people going overboard with their Lacey praise and homerism, when he's proved absolutely NOTHING.
Posted on 10/23/10 at 2:59 am to BradPitt
Good god brad pitt, you continue to show your ignorance as far as football goes. Lacy is going to be a stud, whether your dumbass likes it or not. Undersized? Not physical? lol dumb frick.
Posted on 10/23/10 at 3:05 am to Funky Tide 8
I can already tell by such a delusional comment, alone, you were one of the millions who said "Shula was a great coach" and should be given "another year", weren't you?
WHAT has Lacey done to prove he is "going to be" a stud? He's not a fraction of what Ingram and Richardson were in their first playing seasons and he HASN'T DONE shite in the mop-up roles to prove otherwise. But I guess I'm an idiot because I don't have a crystal ball in front of me like you do?
WHAT has Lacey done to prove he is "going to be" a stud? He's not a fraction of what Ingram and Richardson were in their first playing seasons and he HASN'T DONE shite in the mop-up roles to prove otherwise. But I guess I'm an idiot because I don't have a crystal ball in front of me like you do?
Posted on 10/23/10 at 3:12 am to BradPitt
quote:6'1" 212 is undersized? Especially when Ingram is 5'10" 215
He's undersized.
LINK
quote:He actually is physical, of course it is hard to see when he is not getting touches on the sidelines
He's not physical.
quote:He may have that but many young running backs have the same issue
He has ball security issues.
quote:
He can't break tackles
quote:
He can't break a significantly big run
quote:Repeating self
He has ball security issues
quote:4.4 40 is not fast?
He's not very fast
quote:That is a bold face lie, he must have stolen a GF
I have nothing against the dude,
quote:I guess not 30 carries 204 yards 6.8 YPC 3 Touchdowns, he needs more touches
when he's proved absolutely NOTHING.
Posted on 10/23/10 at 3:22 am to tduecen
Thank you tduecen, saved me some time. I was definitely not someone who wanted to keep shula around, and that is stupid comparison to what I'm debating. Eddie Lacy is a young RB That will prove himself in time, you are just a fricking hater. Lame.
Posted on 10/23/10 at 3:27 am to MagillaGuerilla
BOOM, and what are you still doing up???
Posted on 10/23/10 at 5:11 am to memphisplaya
so he's not coming and it has no issue with our guys because we don't think Tennessee will put up much of a front so that we don't need our 3rd string guy?
Hope so. Honestly it's not a big deal...we're probably taking more OL just in case A.McCullough doesn't perform, but I'm sure he will.
Hope so. Honestly it's not a big deal...we're probably taking more OL just in case A.McCullough doesn't perform, but I'm sure he will.
Posted on 10/23/10 at 9:33 am to BradPitt
quote:
What has Lacey showed us? He's undersized. He's not physical. He has ball security issues. Again, he has ball security issues. He's far from versatile. He can't break tackles. He can't break a significantly big run. He has ball security issues. He's not very fast. And did I mention he has ball security issues?
Wow, I watched him throughout high school and I said this about 6 months ago and
Posted on 10/23/10 at 9:53 am to HeadSlash
The bamers will be blowing him next season. Ball security? Any of the backs would have fumbled if they got hit there. Technique was his problem on the near goal line fumble, even Satan told you that. Now get in the fricking bull ring and get some football sense.
Popular
Back to top
3








