Started By
Message
re: Nibiru and the Anunnaki: are they almost back?
Posted on 4/13/18 at 6:20 am to BowlJackson
Posted on 4/13/18 at 6:20 am to BowlJackson
Posted on 4/13/18 at 7:19 am to Arksulli
quote:
People are far more stupid then they are evil.
So stupidity breeds evil? That is what your sentence here says. I think the word you were looking for was, 'than'
Posted on 4/13/18 at 7:49 am to DannyB
quote:
So stupidity breeds evil?
Probably
Less brainpower and we devolve to basic vices like greed and envy.
Have you never seen Idiocracy?
Posted on 4/13/18 at 11:05 pm to BowlJackson
The only problem with this theory is that a planet 4x further than Pluto from the sun would be absolutely incapable of sustaining life. And if by some unreal miracle it could sustain life than they would spontaneously evaporate if they visited the earth in the past because of our warm climate. The “Goldilocks region” is very specific in a solar system. Distance from sun is the only factor that earth benefitted from and others didn’t. Hell, Venus is our twin and look at them. Possibly the most hostile planet in our solar system because it is a “little closer to the sun” than we are. Mars is a “little further” from the sun than earth is and at night the temps drop to -400 degrees.
This post was edited on 4/13/18 at 11:08 pm
Posted on 4/14/18 at 6:23 am to BowlJackson
The Mayan calendar says nothing about this.
Posted on 4/14/18 at 7:12 am to MaroonNation
quote:
The only problem with this theory is that a planet 4x further than Pluto from the sun would be absolutely incapable of sustaining life.
Maybe life as we know it.
Worms that live in a sulfur environment far too toxic for human life. LINK
While living on the surface of any "dead" planet may not be possible, subterranean survival could be quite possible based on the internal heat of many planets. With earth. Your "Goldilocks Region" may be very specific but it also may be more limited for surface species that need that atmosphere to survive.
An interesting thought is space travel reality over great distances. While we think of rocket or spaceship travel between planets it is actually easier to remain on a planet with a large orbit and travel more without leaving it. If this planet is real and can sustain life it would be easier to travel between planets at a much slower speed but never having to go far from your home.
If this planet can sustain intelligent life and they pass earth even 3,600 years then you can plan accordingly. You could certainly send short range craft to mine resources as you approach planets you know you will pass at defined intervals. Much more sense than sending ships at great distances where time in space is less sure and certainly more hostile.
Posted on 4/14/18 at 6:17 pm to Cheese Grits
No doubt. It has been suggested that the easiest way for us to get to the outer planets would be to ride an asteroid out that way. I just can’t imagine a planet that far out in the solar system being geothermically active to sustain subterranean life.
Posted on 4/14/18 at 7:17 pm to MaroonNation
I think 1 theory out there is our sun has a twin, still plenty hot, that never got to ignition and when our sun dies might be what heats our system if it ignites.
Posted on 4/14/18 at 8:52 pm to Cheese Grits
When our sun dies the Earth will die too so it won't really matter anyway.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News