Nibiru and the Anunnaki: are they almost back?

quote:

---

According to certain researchers and authors, the Anunnaki are due to return to Earth in order “fix what they had done wrong” in order to accelerate a spiritual awakening and the evolution of human consciousness.

---

We are fricked.

Because ISIS were the ones who destroyed all of their history and monuments, hopefully that's who the Anunnaki "enlighten" first... I hope they enlighten the shite out of them.

quote:

---

Goliath was said to be a nephilim. They were offspring of fallen angels and human women according to the Old Testament.

---

According to the legends of the ancient Sumerians the Anunnaki married human women and interbred.

This was seen as an abomination by the Anunnaki leader who wished to then end their experiment of humans. They were getting ready to evacuate the planet anyway as Nibiru was about to leave again. At the time there was an ice sheet built up on Antarctica 4-5 times bigger than today. They calculated that the gravitational forces from Nibiru as it passed Earth would knock the ice sheet loose into the ocean, causing floods over most of the world, especially devastating to the area of their former settlements in the Fertile Crescent. The Anunnaki scientist who had been the one to combine their own DNA with that of Homo Erectus to create humans did not want to see his creation die, and warned his favorite servant to build a craft for him and his family, and to take aboard grains from all the domesticated crops given to us by the Anunnaki. They survived as did other groups of humans further north who had been cast out of "Eden".
This was the Great Flood talked about in the Bible and the Epic of Gilgamesh, and told about by ancient civilizations all over the world.




Most of Genesis comes directly from the Sumerian story of creation, and even throughout the rest of the Old Testament there's many parallels with ancient Sumerian legends. Not surprising considering the proximity of Israel and ancient Sumer.

Interesting thing about the Sumerian version of the flood story... How the frick did a 6000 yr old civilization from the middle east know about Antarctica??

quote:

---

This was the Great Flood talked about in the Bible and the Epic of Gilgamesh, and told about by ancient civilizations all over the world.

---

Every civilization has flood stories. Because every ancient civilization was founded next to a major river.

Now the Middle East can actually lay claim to a truly horrifying flood event that makes the other floods pale in comparison. If the Black Sea Deluge theory is correct the Black Sea, which has periodically been sealed off from the Mediterranean Ocean, was once a large freshwater lake until it got reconnected sometime around 5000 BC.

While there are arguments over how violent the deluge was the Black Sea was at least 100ft lower and a freshwater lake before this happened. Some say as much as 250 ft lower. The steadily rising water would have seen like a punishment from a very angry god to people back then... not only did it swallow up the many lakeside villages but the water turned brackish and then into saltwater meaning it was now unsafe to drink.

Explain the Sumerians knowledge of Antartica and Lower Africa? Or their knowledge of our exact place in the solar system?

Speaking of Antarctica, there's an ancient map that exists that shows an aerial view of the Antarctic landmass free of ice. It even correctly maps waterways hidden today by ice and even the plateu in which the Canary Islands sit. Nobody knows its origins, just that "it was copied from an older map, which was copied from and older map, and so forth." Its been thousands if years since Antarctica was last ice free. And this isn't even the only ancient map which shows the world before the last ice age.

Lower Africa isn't much of a stretch. We know that Egypt had sporadic contact with lower Africa for thousands of years via the Nubians and that the Sumerians, in turn, had contact with Egypt.

The map you are referencing is of the old theory of Terres Australes, as it says to the side of the map. This was a very common belief that the Northern Landmasses had to have a huge Southern continent to "balance" them. Note when the map was made, 1739. Places like the Canary Islands had been common knowledge in Europe for close to two thousand years at that date.

South America is very clearly detailed... because by then Europeans had thoroughly explored most of it. You will note Nouvelle Hollande, which was given the name Australia later on because of the belief in Terres Australes, is unfinished because at that time only certain parts of the Australian coast line had been explored.

There was, indeed, a very southern continent but its only the fifth largest continent, though its twice as big as its neighbor to the North Australia. When you deglaciate Antartica it really doesn't look very much like the Buache Map. Even if you add in the glaciers it still doesn't fit the profile of the map.

There is another southern continent in Zealandia which mostly sank beneath the waves after breaking away from Australia 65 million years ago. People argue whether it should be considered a microcontinent but its size (half the size of Australia) and the thickness of the crust supports labeling it as a full fledged continent, albeit the smallest one. Obviously Zealandia is named after the largest part of the continent above water, New Zealand.

quote:

---

The map was copied in 1739, not made in 1739. Its origins are much much older.

---

And yet the only accurate cartography on it is what Europeans knew in 1739. Where is the rest of Australia? It isn't on the map because it wasn't until 1770 that someone sailed around the entire continent. New Zealand isn't even on there.

quote:

---

And the underwater plateau on which the Canary Islands sit was common knowledge in Europe

---

Among cartographers and sailors? Well, yes. Now if you are going by what the average European on the street back then knew.. no. But close to three hundred years later we live in a country where 16 percent of the population either believes the Earth is flat or isn't sure. That goes up to a whopping 34 percent among 18-24 year olds. Which is sure to be a comfort to those of us growing older knowing that will be the generation to take care of us in our final years.

But sailors in that day were very good at making nautical measurements. Nautical charts from that time period show very accurate depth measurements of the US coastline... and Europeans have been visiting the Canary Islands at least since Julius was saying "et tu, Brute?" Quite likely even longer.

As for their knowledge of the stars and stellar cartography... all of the ancient civilizations tended to have those. When you believe the stars portend your destiny and are the only warning you might have before some deity decides to get his smite on and go Old Testament on you then you study them very carefully.

Ancient civilizations tended to be insanely stable so there was plenty of time for that knowledge to accrue. Unfortunately as those civilizations waned and were picked off by barbarians that knowledge got lost again.

As for flying machines and aliens... there are certainly some stylized pieces of art, be they drawings or figurines, that look like airplanes. Or a fish. Or bird. I wasn't around back then so I can't be sure but pretty much every piece of evidence points to them being... fish and birds.

Aliens though... particularly aliens that come down here to have kinky alien sex with our women and get children from them... Unlike most science fiction if we ever do encounter intelligent life out there we won't be genetically compatible with them. Chimps share 98.8 of our DNA and we can't have children with them.

A planet that spends thousands of years at a time in the outermost regions of the Kuiper Belt is not going to support intelligent life. It won't have spent long enough within the Goldilocks zone for life to ever have evolved to that point. And what life did evolve would have frozen solid when it went back to the Kuiper Belt. Not even tardigrades could pull that off. Probably. Those are some hardy little buggers.

We want ancient civilizations to have encountered aliens because we want to encounter aliens. We are projecting what we want onto their existence and carefully cherry picking evidence to fit those beliefs. Did they encounter aliens and have kinky James T. Kirk type sex with them? Probably not.

quote:

---

The average history text book in America only contains 2-3 sentences about the ancient Sumerians.

---

Are you sure about that? We spent at least a week Freshman year covering Sumer.

quote:

---

those at NASA and the Pentagon who believe this

---

Is there another article with sources from NASA or the Pentagon, because I don't believe I saw them in the linked article

Holy shite that dude was not afraid to crank out some calf raises