Started By
Message
re: Mississippi Senate Passes a Bill that Makes Us Look Even Worse
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:36 am to heartbreakTiger
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:36 am to heartbreakTiger
quote:
You have a place like commanders palace it doesn't out right ban any race but it makes it highly white by having extremely pricey items, dress codes and other general rules
Damn, hbt.
1
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:37 am to Anthony_Pel_Davis
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:37 am to UMTigerRebel
quote:
I just want to see the local news stations interviews with people who support said business.
I don't. There shouldn't be any outrage. But there will....because too many people in this country would rather whine and complain.
My philosophy is that if I don't like a certain place's policy, I won't go there.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:37 am to heartbreakTiger
quote:
no visible tats allowed
Not that I would support that, but could you not do that. A tat is an optional expression just like a jersey or whatever. So couldn't i kick all tatted people out of there?
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:38 am to CheeseburgerEddie
I'm not sure what happened to bring this bill up in MS but didn't the one in Arizona start with a Christian wedding cake bakery refusing to work for a gay couples wedding?
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:39 am to UMTigerRebel
I'm just saying how they keep the higher levels of all races in, they wouldn't let in white trash with neck tats. The smart business is above racism its about classism
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:40 am to UMRealist
There needs to be a 100% clear division in "marriage" as it is referred to in Christianity and how it is used socially.
Leave marriage for the christians and name it something else for everything out of the church.
Leave marriage for the christians and name it something else for everything out of the church.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:40 am to pankReb
I was more so talking about the types of people news stations interview. They usually pick the types to interview who can't speak proper English, are tatted up in their wife beaters, sitting in front of their trailer, or can't speak proper English, have their pants hanging well below their arse, and more gold in their mouth than I have in jewelry.
ETA: they're usually good for a few laughs.
ETA: they're usually good for a few laughs.
This post was edited on 3/3/14 at 11:41 am
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:41 am to CheeseburgerEddie
That won't please he LGBT community but I agree with you.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:41 am to pankReb
quote:exactly but too many people in America have a twisted understanding of what the constitution and bill of rights is suppose to do.
My philosophy is that if I don't like a certain place's policy, I won't go there.
They also need the gov to hold their hand make unicorn laws. Im not going to call jindal and say hey jindal give me a tank from the national guard so i can be let in the hipster bar. I might want the tank to destroy them but not just so i can get equal service.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:41 am to UMRealist
quote:
I'm not sure what happened to bring this bill up in MS but didn't the one in Arizona start with a Christian wedding cake bakery refusing to work for a gay couples wedding?
I think so. And I think it's BS that there was so much controversy over it. If I were the bakery's owner, their cake would come out looking like complete shite. Not because of their sexuality, but because I was forced by the government to do it.
"Oops...sorry for your cake looking like I stomped on it. Must have been the humidity....or the car ride over. No charge and sorry about ruining the wedding."
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:41 am to Anthony_Pel_Davis
Mississippi is Alabama's inbred sister
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:42 am to CheeseburgerEddie
I'm pretty sure you could since it isn't discrimination based on any protected class
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:43 am to UMTigerRebel
quote:
I was more so talking about the types of people news stations interview. They usually pick the types to interview who can't speak proper English, are tatted up in their wife beaters, sitting in front of their trailer, or can't speak proper English, have their pants hanging well below their arse, and more gold in their mouth than I have in jewelry.
ETA: they're usually good for a few laughs.
yeah...that's what I was talking about too.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:43 am to The Calvin
quote:
Mississippi is Alabama's inbred sister
that's like a double negative.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:49 am to pankReb
Wow I did not expect this to get this many replies
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:51 am to CheeseburgerEddie
I'm of the thought that the government shouldn't be defining marriage to begin with. If there is a church that wants to marry a gay couple, so be it. If there's an insurance company that wants to provide benefits to a civil union/gay couple then so be it.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:53 am to BluegrassBelle
I agree, but they should be clearly separated.
Churches, etc. can perform "marriages" to whomever their ruling authorities approve.
The gov. can have their own thing that they approve which is just not called a marriage.
Churches, etc. can perform "marriages" to whomever their ruling authorities approve.
The gov. can have their own thing that they approve which is just not called a marriage.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:56 am to CheeseburgerEddie
churches can have marriages, the gov can call them civil unions and still offer all the benefits of what were once called marriages.
the gays wont go for it even though it accomplishes their objectives.
the gays wont go for it even though it accomplishes their objectives.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:57 am to BluegrassBelle
Governments began "defining" marriage in the 20's and 30's to keep whites and blacks from marrying each other.
Page 3 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News