Started By
Message

re: Let's discuss how ban bets are useless

Posted on 11/21/16 at 6:44 pm to
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
86652 posts
Posted on 11/21/16 at 6:44 pm to
Then it's up to you and you alone, (since you've brought it up many times and made threads about it) to prove where I accepted the bet.

:crickets:
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
19569 posts
Posted on 11/21/16 at 7:56 pm to
stonehog
Posted by HolographicCharizard
Nashville
Member since Jul 2016
1979 posts
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:14 pm to
I know exactly who you are talking about, OP. Person A is clearly a Taint Tickler 9.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Person A is clearly a Taint Tickler 9.




And a nickname is born

Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
47316 posts
Posted on 11/21/16 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

One could also argue that because ban bets are against the forum rules, they are not valid.


If two men agree to something even if it's against the rules, it should be upheld. Don't want to break the rules? Don't agree to it
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
47316 posts
Posted on 11/21/16 at 11:27 pm to
Yeah burden of proof is on Shaft
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
86652 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 5:17 am to
And he has none.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 7:24 am to
quote:

And he has none.


Incorrect. You can make a semantics argument, which you're doing, but imo it's pretty cowardly.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
86652 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 7:28 am to
There's no semantics, I never agreed to the terms you laid out.


Period!
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:08 am to
quote:

There's no semantics, I never agreed to the terms you laid out.




"Sure, why not" is consent, maybe not affirmative consent, but consent nonetheless
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
86652 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:13 am to
But then you laid out the leave the board forever shite, which I didn't respond to, NYC has it nailed on the last page.

I played you dumbasses.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:16 am to
I asked if you wanted to make a permaban bet, you said "sure, why not".


You played nobody.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
86652 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:18 am to
And then you laid out your terms, I didn't accept them.

Pretty fricking simple.
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
16093 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:24 am to
Clearly, what is needed is a contract template for ban bets. The determined length and parameters can all be adjusted, but the template has to be copied and pasted by both parties to count as a signature.
Posted by HolographicCharizard
Nashville
Member since Jul 2016
1979 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:28 am to
Let's make a final decision on the subject.

"Let's have sex"
"Sure, why not."

Sounds like they are definitely going to have sex, just as you definitely accepted the ban bet. Not our fault you are too stupid to look at things objectively.
This post was edited on 11/22/16 at 8:55 am
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
86652 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Sounds like they are ddfinitely going to have sex, just as you definitely accepted the ban bet. Not our fault you are too stupid to look at things objectively.

oh really? just how dumb are you?

I never accepted the terms of his ban bet. Period!!!!
This post was edited on 11/22/16 at 8:34 am
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Let's make a final decision on the subject.

"Let's have sex"
"Sure, why not."

Sounds like they are ddfinitely going to have sex,


Or at least tickle a taint
Posted by HolographicCharizard
Nashville
Member since Jul 2016
1979 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:36 am to
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
86652 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Ok, so 7 wins or less, I go away forever. 8 wins or more, you go away forever
still waiting for proof that I accepted these terms.

Just admit there is none and we can be on our way, until then I'm not gonna let you live it down.
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
47316 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Incorrect

You haven't provided any in this thread?

If you have proof then why are you hiding it?


If you asked if he wanted to make a permaban bet and then he said "Sure why not" that doesn't obligate him to whatever terms you come up with after that. Unless you laid out the terms and then he accepted the terms, then there's no agreement.

I don't know what did or didn't happen but so far you haven't said anything indicating an agreement.
This post was edited on 11/22/16 at 12:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter