Started By
Message
re: Let's discuss how ban bets are useless
Posted on 11/21/16 at 6:44 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Posted on 11/21/16 at 6:44 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Then it's up to you and you alone, (since you've brought it up many times and made threads about it) to prove where I accepted the bet.
:crickets:
:crickets:
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:14 pm to hawgfaninc
I know exactly who you are talking about, OP. Person A is clearly a Taint Tickler 9.
Posted on 11/21/16 at 10:52 pm to HolographicCharizard
quote:
Person A is clearly a Taint Tickler 9.
And a nickname is born
Posted on 11/21/16 at 11:27 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
One could also argue that because ban bets are against the forum rules, they are not valid.
If two men agree to something even if it's against the rules, it should be upheld. Don't want to break the rules? Don't agree to it
Posted on 11/21/16 at 11:27 pm to TT9
Yeah burden of proof is on Shaft
Posted on 11/22/16 at 7:24 am to TT9
quote:
And he has none.
Incorrect. You can make a semantics argument, which you're doing, but imo it's pretty cowardly.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 7:28 am to Vols&Shaft83
There's no semantics, I never agreed to the terms you laid out.
Period!
Period!
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:08 am to TT9
quote:
There's no semantics, I never agreed to the terms you laid out.
"Sure, why not" is consent, maybe not affirmative consent, but consent nonetheless
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:13 am to Vols&Shaft83
But then you laid out the leave the board forever shite, which I didn't respond to, NYC has it nailed on the last page.
I played you dumbasses.
I played you dumbasses.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:16 am to TT9
I asked if you wanted to make a permaban bet, you said "sure, why not".
You played nobody.
You played nobody.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:18 am to Vols&Shaft83
And then you laid out your terms, I didn't accept them.
Pretty fricking simple.
Pretty fricking simple.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:24 am to Vols&Shaft83
Clearly, what is needed is a contract template for ban bets. The determined length and parameters can all be adjusted, but the template has to be copied and pasted by both parties to count as a signature.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:28 am to crispyUGA
Let's make a final decision on the subject.
"Let's have sex"
"Sure, why not."
Sounds like they are definitely going to have sex, just as you definitely accepted the ban bet. Not our fault you are too stupid to look at things objectively.
"Let's have sex"
"Sure, why not."
Sounds like they are definitely going to have sex, just as you definitely accepted the ban bet. Not our fault you are too stupid to look at things objectively.
This post was edited on 11/22/16 at 8:55 am
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:32 am to HolographicCharizard
quote:oh really? just how dumb are you?
Sounds like they are ddfinitely going to have sex, just as you definitely accepted the ban bet. Not our fault you are too stupid to look at things objectively.
I never accepted the terms of his ban bet. Period!!!!
This post was edited on 11/22/16 at 8:34 am
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:36 am to HolographicCharizard
quote:
Let's make a final decision on the subject.
"Let's have sex"
"Sure, why not."
Sounds like they are ddfinitely going to have sex,
Or at least tickle a taint
Posted on 11/22/16 at 8:40 am to NYCAuburn
quote:still waiting for proof that I accepted these terms.
Ok, so 7 wins or less, I go away forever. 8 wins or more, you go away forever
Just admit there is none and we can be on our way, until then I'm not gonna let you live it down.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 12:34 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Incorrect
You haven't provided any in this thread?
If you have proof then why are you hiding it?
If you asked if he wanted to make a permaban bet and then he said "Sure why not" that doesn't obligate him to whatever terms you come up with after that. Unless you laid out the terms and then he accepted the terms, then there's no agreement.
I don't know what did or didn't happen but so far you haven't said anything indicating an agreement.
This post was edited on 11/22/16 at 12:38 pm
Back to top
