Started By
Message

re: Georgia, the answer is still NO

Posted on 3/28/18 at 9:32 am to
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23099 posts
Posted on 3/28/18 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Which areas? The only states that are siphoning off water are
Alabama and Florida



bullshite. Atlanta siphons 90% of it's 300 MILLION gallon daily use from the Chattahoochee.

It's primary use in Alabama is hydroelectric power for the southeastern part of the state.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
28092 posts
Posted on 3/28/18 at 9:41 am to
quote:

If you can't control your growth responsibly and ration your own water


Such complete bullshite BTW...Birmingham or Montgomery would give it's left nut for Atlanta's growth and economy.

BTW,Atlanta is actually using LESS WATER than it 10 years ago despite increasing it population
by of 1 million residents as is the entire state

quote:

metro Atlanta is withdrawing 10 percent less water over the past decade despite growing by more than 1 million people.


HIGHLY doubt Alabama could say the same.




quote:

You're full of shite. You've never seen that happen


Have no idea about sprinklers but I do know for a fact that Lake Harding was close to full level during the '07 drought while Lake Lanier was 20+ feet below level.BTW,what are the exact water restrictions east Alabama is under every summer?

quote:

entitled to water belonging to others.



So water originating in Georgia and within Georgia boundaries belongs to others?


This post was edited on 3/28/18 at 12:00 pm
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
28092 posts
Posted on 3/28/18 at 9:51 am to
quote:

bullshite. Atlanta siphons 90% of it's 300 MILLION gallon daily use from the Chattahoochee


You gotta link? Not even the attorneys for the state of Florida are using Metro Atlanta's water consumption as parts of their lawsuit...they are know targeting the states agricultural industry as the reason for the lawsuit

quote:

In a rare public appeal, Deal said Florida was forced to target Georgia’s agriculture industry in part because of successful conservation efforts by metro Atlanta. He pointed to data provided by his office that show metro Atlanta is withdrawing 10 percent less water over the past decade despite growing by more than 1 million people.
This post was edited on 3/28/18 at 9:53 am
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
28092 posts
Posted on 3/28/18 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Those to the South budget their water better


A complete falsehood here ya go
Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22045 posts
Posted on 3/28/18 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

math

quote:

University of Georgia


We deserve what we got then
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
28092 posts
Posted on 3/28/18 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

It's primary use in Alabama is hydroelectric power for the southeastern part of the state.



Then they need to upgrade to natural gas...our state did between 2000 and 2010 and saved
BILLIONS of gallons of water

quote:

Several of the facilities were decommissioned between 2000 and 2010 – during the worst of the drought years and the decade that saw usage plunge nearly 28 percent, said Steve Lawrence, a hydrologist with the USGS in Atlanta.

Several other plants converted from coal-fired, which needs plenty of water to cool it as an energy source, to natural gas, Lawrence said.

"Thermoelectric withdrawals account typically for a third of withdrawals, so all water withdrawals decrease when such a large user drops its share," Lawrence said.




Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
72897 posts
Posted on 3/28/18 at 3:11 pm to
RD, thanks for taking the time to fact-whip these gimps.

Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
72897 posts
Posted on 3/28/18 at 3:13 pm to
RD, can i get a favor? Remember the deck thread? Would you mind editing the comment that called out another poster’s profession? You simply quoted me, but then I edited my post, but your quote remains....
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
28092 posts
Posted on 3/28/18 at 3:19 pm to
10-4...I don't remember making a comment in the thread though
Posted by Jazzbo Depew
Bug Tussle
Member since Dec 2017
1765 posts
Posted on 3/28/18 at 3:41 pm to
V&S, I always enjoy reading your posts.



How great was last year's Rose Bowl ? The land thieves vs the water thieves ?
Posted by DawgGONIT
Member since May 2015
2961 posts
Posted on 4/1/18 at 4:11 am to
They turk err land!
Posted by Luke
1113 Chartres Street, NOLA
Member since Nov 2004
14130 posts
Posted on 4/2/18 at 6:42 am to
You obviously have no clue of how this works legally...
Posted by Perfect Circle
S W Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
7664 posts
Posted on 4/2/18 at 9:35 pm to
It's simple, Alabama has more water and less people; Georgia has more people and less water.

In terms of inland, navigable waterways, AKA "big, wide, deep rivers, Alabama ranks 6th, nationally. Georgia ranks 14th. Alabama has almost double the amount of fresh water as Georgia. We don't need Georgia water.

One of the many reasons we call Alabama "Sweet Home!"
This post was edited on 4/2/18 at 9:37 pm
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
28092 posts
Posted on 4/3/18 at 7:39 am to
quote:

Alabama has more water and less people; Georgia has more people and less water.


Then there should be no need for Georgia's water,correct?Fact is the state had 3 decade decline in
water use (29%) and an almost 70% increase in population.

Metro Atlanta also has a 10% decline in water use from the
previous decade.The state has spent BIILLIONS on water conservation along with upgrading thermoelectric and coal power plants to natural gas (by far the biggest factor in saVing water)

quote:

Several of the facilities were decommissioned between 2000 and 2010 – during the worst of the drought years and the decade that saw usage plunge nearly 28 percent, said Steve Lawrence, a hydrologist with the USGS in Atlanta. 

Several other plants converted from coal-fired, which needs plenty of water to cool it as an energy source, to natural gas, Lawrence said. 

"Thermoelectric withdrawals account typically for a third of withdrawals, so all water withdrawals decrease when such a large user drops its share," Lawrence said. 






Simple,Alabama needs to upgrade it's power plants and SPEND the money on conservation efforts.
This post was edited on 4/3/18 at 11:47 am
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
21581 posts
Posted on 4/3/18 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Then they need to upgrade to natural gas...our state did between 2000 and 2010 and saved
BILLIONS of gallons of water




Yes...but cost of generation ($/MWh) is significantly higher for combined cycle plants than hydroelectric dams.


Oh...and

quote:

Flowing water referred to as Hydropower is the most widely used renewable energy source in the world. Hydropower generates less pollution than fuel-burning power generation methods and creates public recreational areas and new habitats for wildlife.


This, according to the Georgia Power Hydroelectric website
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter