Started By
Message
re: 9/11 Was A Conspiracy!
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:00 am to oldcharlie8
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:00 am to oldcharlie8
They technically would have more to tangibly gain from the event than terrorist groups would.
1
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:33 am to Manzielathon
Popular Mechanics done a nice article with actual science and shite debunking this stupid conspiracy.
Become enlightened.
Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy
These websites making up these things make a shite ton of money off of you idiots.
Become enlightened.
Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy
These websites making up these things make a shite ton of money off of you idiots.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 7:34 am
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:44 am to Prettyboy Floyd
sleepingtiger, other crazy mizzou posters and petey know better
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:46 am to heartbreakTiger
quote:
sleepingtiger, other crazy mizzou posters and petey know better
We had this argument a while back on the Georgia Sports board. I kept linking them to scientific articles debunking their bullshite and got down voted and harassed for it.
Go figure.....a state like Georgia having a bunch of looney toons believing this shite.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:52 am to Prettyboy Floyd
Posted on 6/26/14 at 8:00 am to heartbreakTiger
It's funny I explained how the jet fuel wasn't even in play but to get the fire going and then burns off. Just like lighting your charcoal with lighter fluid, it all burned off within the first few minutes. Later on...jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel.
Then you ask how he knew the melted stuff was even steel...no response but continues to insist it was steel.
Finally you ask for an explanation of how molten steel could still be there six weeks later. It doesn't matter apparently.
Hell kingbob gave a great explaination of how it happened using science at the start of the thread. It's ignored.
Then you ask how he knew the melted stuff was even steel...no response but continues to insist it was steel.
Finally you ask for an explanation of how molten steel could still be there six weeks later. It doesn't matter apparently.
Hell kingbob gave a great explaination of how it happened using science at the start of the thread. It's ignored.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 8:49 am to Duke
Did you actually expect Mogray to listen to any arguments that don't support his position?
He'll never concede the point ever, no matter how wrong he is. It's like arguing with a fricking woman, you don't win or lose, you just waste time.
He'll never concede the point ever, no matter how wrong he is. It's like arguing with a fricking woman, you don't win or lose, you just waste time.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 8:51 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Did you actually expect Mogray to listen to any arguments that don't support his position?
No, but it's worth pointing out the flaws anyway.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 8:53 am to Duke
That guy is a sad disaster of a person.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 8:56 am to Slippery Slope
Am I the only one bothered by the constant talk of lava? It was molten whatevermaterial, not lava. The WTC wasn't built on top of fricking Krakatoa.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 8:57 am
Posted on 6/26/14 at 8:57 am to OMLandshark
quote:
I don't give a frick about eyewitnesses as long as you can't convince me that it is scientifically possible. There are plenty of so-called "eyewitnesses" that claim things just as bizarre as that, but they have no evidence, and this is even more ridiculous since it is scientifically impossible. If I threw a few gallons of lava into your den, it would solidify within the minute, and you'd be able to comfortably walk on it within 10 minutes. Lava doesn't just flow through a building that was just seconds ago at room temperature, not to mention 6 weeks later. Your understanding of basic reality are flawed, and you are educationally subnormal to think that lava could just hang around for over a month.
The presence of molten metal is not refuted, it's officially reported by a number of sources, and anyone can see it with their own eyes. You're refuting something that isn't possible to refute.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 8:59 am to Sleeping Tiger
Welcome back, dum-dum 
Posted on 6/26/14 at 8:59 am to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
The presence of molten metal is not refuted, it's officially reported by a number of sources, and anyone can see it with their own eyes. You're refuting something that isn't possible to refute.
but lava tho
there was lava
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:02 am to Duke
quote:
It's funny I explained how the jet fuel wasn't even in play but to get the fire going and then burns off. Just like lighting your charcoal with lighter fluid, it all burned off within the first few minutes. Later on...jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel.
Then you ask how he knew the melted stuff was even steel...no response but continues to insist it was steel.
Finally you ask for an explanation of how molten steel could still be there six weeks later. It doesn't matter apparently.
Hell kingbob gave a great explaination of how it happened using science at the start of the thread. It's ignored.
I could honestly care less about this topic, against my better judgement I contributed in this thread, it's not even close to a topic that I'd focus on in regards to 911 because it's overall pointless and I know the responses I'm going to get.
But anyway, thermite, a 'bitches brew of thermite', is what caused metal to turn liquid.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:05 am to Sleeping Tiger
This thread is a thanksgiving meal for paranoid trolls.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:08 am to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
The presence of molten metal is not refuted, it's officially reported by a number of sources
No it is not. Stop saying that. Where are some links of people saying they were there and saw molten steel?
quote:
and anyone can see it with their own eyes.
Where? There's only one vague picture of all the lava that everyone saw?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:10 am to Slippery Slope
You're not looking through semen laced eyes. Maybe that's the problem.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 9:10 am
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:11 am to KSGamecock
quote:
Well yea there was a conspiracy. A conspiracy by a well funded organization with bases and operatives across the globe and nefarious plans for world domination secretly planned the attack and sent twenty of its agents to commit the deed. It was definitely a conspiracy.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:11 am to Hardy_Har
I want to shite in his mouth.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:14 am to Sleeping Tiger
Why are you obsessed with the idea of the molten metal being steel? Have you ever seen the inner workings of a building like that? There are enough copper wires and non-steel cables running through the walls to easily create a pool of molten metal under those circumstances.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 9:15 am
Page 9 of 48
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News