Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/5/19 at 4:55 pm to wubilli
Will Odom latch out on Missouri fans for not going to the games. Also for not supporting the team and coaches?
Posted on 1/5/19 at 6:01 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
I am wondering why did Bryant picked Missouri over Auburn and others?
Because Mizzou had the worst situation out of all the teams he was looking at. At least at his position. Well, Arky may be worse but we still have other positions of strength. If you don't think the lack of competition in his eyes didn't play a role, you're crazy. If he was wanting to win 9, 10 or 11 games he would have gone to OU or tOSU or something but he might not have as easy of a route to the starting job.
Posted on 1/5/19 at 6:14 pm to wubilli
I know that I'm asking lefty
Posted on 1/5/19 at 6:24 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:
Every year people predict great things.
Lol! What? This board is gloom and doom as can be and 99% of the predictions in this thread are conservative as hell if not down right pessimistic. Mizzou fans revel in negativity. It’s their comfort zone.
You just make this stuff up in your head?
This post was edited on 1/5/19 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 1/5/19 at 6:52 pm to reedus23
quote:
Because Mizzou had the worst situation out of all the teams he was looking at. At least at his position. Well, Arky may be worse but we still have other positions of strength. If you don't think the lack of competition in his eyes didn't play a role, you're crazy. If he was wanting to win 9, 10 or 11 games he would have gone to OU or tOSU or something but he might not have as easy of a route to the starting job.
You are the crazy one! tOSU and OU do not want just 1 year guy and was looking for someone better and both got the one they needed. One good thing from getting Bryant is he should help with some things that he had done at Clemson that Missouri might not have caught on among the top programs. That is why this was huge! Some new playbook ideas, some new workout systems that might be better than what Missouri have right now, and help with getting recruits and possible new recruiting tactics. Getting someone that is a top player from a powerhouse is huge!
Posted on 1/5/19 at 9:00 pm to TrueLefty
Only on this board will it be explained that we got a top player because of how bad we are.
LOL
I’m never disappointed
LOL
I’m never disappointed
Posted on 1/5/19 at 9:41 pm to JesusQuintana
Dude you predicted 7-5 for this season - talk about negative
This post was edited on 1/5/19 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 1/5/19 at 9:41 pm to TrueLefty
Bo will lose a game or two he should win. It's inevitable so get use to it.
Posted on 1/5/19 at 9:47 pm to Mizzou4ever
Almost every coach loses 1-2 games that he should win every year. The teams that made the playoff this season are the only ones that didn’t blow a game that they should have won.
Posted on 1/5/19 at 10:06 pm to wubilli
Like the Scar and Kentucky losses? Really?
Posted on 1/5/19 at 10:10 pm to wubilli
Pinkel rarely did
Posted on 1/5/19 at 10:15 pm to MIZ_COU
Pinkel had probably 3 out of his 15 years that his team didn’t blow a game that they should have won.
Posted on 1/5/19 at 10:39 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:
Pinkel rarely did
2005- New Mexico, Kansas
2006- aTm, Iowa State, Oregon State
2008- Oklahoma State, Kansas
2009- Nebraska, Baylor, Navy
2010- Texas Tech, Iowa
2011- Arizona State, Baylor
2012- Vanderbilt, Syracuse
2013- South Carolina
2014- Indiana
2015- Kentucky, Vanderbilt
Posted on 1/5/19 at 10:56 pm to navynuke
Navy with the list, I would have added maybe 1-2 more games but that’s a pretty good list.
Pete Carroll is the coach that would be all time great except for key letdowns. He had a 6 year run at USC where his team was the best in the nation, but only played for 3 because of blowing games. He also blew a Super Bowl to the Patriots.
Pete Carroll is the coach that would be all time great except for key letdowns. He had a 6 year run at USC where his team was the best in the nation, but only played for 3 because of blowing games. He also blew a Super Bowl to the Patriots.
Posted on 1/5/19 at 10:59 pm to wubilli
What two games would you have added over that 10 year period?
Posted on 1/5/19 at 11:02 pm to navynuke
2010 Nebraska
2013 Auburn (kul and the DL lost that game for Pinkel)
2013 Auburn (kul and the DL lost that game for Pinkel)
Posted on 1/5/19 at 11:20 pm to Mizzou4ever
If you make those 2 games wins for Mizzou then we make the Vandy and Purdue games losses for Mizzou. I wish people would quit complaining about those 2 games, because it all evens out in the end.
Posted on 1/5/19 at 11:22 pm to wubilli
yeah OK but it still depends on how you define should have won.
2015 we sucked
2014 Indiana had a good RB and we know Steckel's issues with the run
2013 Losing to a team in OT that finished ranked 4th is not bed shitting although the defense on that 4th and long was dumb Auburn was more of a should have won - we let them open holes you could drive a motorhome through.
2012 We sucked and were playing with a walk on OL
2009 Nebraska finished 10-4 and had a good RB. Navy could run
if you limit it to straight bed shitting the list is smaller - like Indiana, Baylor, Texas Tech, Iowa, Navy and then my memory get's hazy
2015 we sucked
2014 Indiana had a good RB and we know Steckel's issues with the run
2013 Losing to a team in OT that finished ranked 4th is not bed shitting although the defense on that 4th and long was dumb Auburn was more of a should have won - we let them open holes you could drive a motorhome through.
2012 We sucked and were playing with a walk on OL
2009 Nebraska finished 10-4 and had a good RB. Navy could run
if you limit it to straight bed shitting the list is smaller - like Indiana, Baylor, Texas Tech, Iowa, Navy and then my memory get's hazy
Posted on 1/5/19 at 11:23 pm to wubilli
Fair enough.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News