3
Started By
Message
Our receivers are terrible
Posted on 9/26/15 at 8:45 pm
Posted on 9/26/15 at 8:45 pm
Here's the truth about our offense, we have no one with hands or the ability to make difficult catches.
If we had a Maclin/DX/Washington/Sasser on this team we would be killing it.
If we had a Maclin/DX/Washington/Sasser on this team we would be killing it.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 8:59 pm to TigerCruise
Frustrating as hell. I really don't like this offense. At all.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 9:48 pm to TigerCruise
Not all on them. Mauk missed several open guys.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 9:52 pm to jafo
Mauk was awful again tonight. The OL wasn't good either, but Mauk is not going to win us any games. We don't have any playmakers on offense either, but Mauk could have had 5-6 picks tonight if the UK secondary could catch.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 9:53 pm to mosoblkcougar
The truth is, Mauk throws such ducks that no one, not even the defense, can catch them
Posted on 9/26/15 at 9:59 pm to TigerCruise
You guys can say what you will but Maty played his arse off for 3 quarters...the 4th not so good.
Where the hell was our run D? And middle coverage?
Where the hell was our run D? And middle coverage?
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:02 pm to Wtodd
He played hard, sure, but his passing stats were terrible again. 15-30 for 180 yards won't get it done.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:06 pm to mosoblkcougar
quote:
but his passing stats were terrible again
Doesn't tell the whole story
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:07 pm to Wtodd
I don't get the Mauk love. What has he done to make you think he deserves more time than Lock. I am not trying to start shite or anything but Mauk sucks, like for real. He is not good. He makes absolutely terrible decisions, constantly.
Edit:15-30 for 180 yards and he is showing no signs of improvement as time goes along.
Edit:15-30 for 180 yards and he is showing no signs of improvement as time goes along.
This post was edited on 9/26/15 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:11 pm to Wtodd
Receivers dropped some passes, they also bailed him out of a couple of terrible interceptions.
If the UK DBs could catch he would have thrown 3 or 4 tonight.
If the UK DBs could catch he would have thrown 3 or 4 tonight.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:11 pm to everytrueson
quote:
I don't get the Mauk love.
IF Lock makes 1 throw and MM makes 1 throw (assuming the catches are made) we win
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:14 pm to Wtodd
No, just no. There are many MANY bad decisions Mauk makes throughout games.
One of many tonight was not taking a first down run and instead overthrowing a ball deep in 2nd quarter. He just does not appear to think about what he is doing out there. If UK was any good on defense Mauk would have had at least 3 INTs
One of many tonight was not taking a first down run and instead overthrowing a ball deep in 2nd quarter. He just does not appear to think about what he is doing out there. If UK was any good on defense Mauk would have had at least 3 INTs
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:16 pm to everytrueson
quote:
If UK was any good on defense Mauk would have had at least 3 INTs
I agree with this but it's not all Maty
Edit: 111 yds rushing ain't going to get it done
This post was edited on 9/26/15 at 10:17 pm
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:17 pm to everytrueson
quote:
I don't get the Mauk love
It's not mauk love, it's indifference.
He and lock both have their upside and downside, the truth is though he only did not lose us this game.
The receivers are fricking awful. Find any other team that has receivers dropping passes like we do. Not just one week, but each and every week.
How many drops did kentucky have tonight?
Are you telling me kentucky has a better receiving corps than us, and if so how the hell is that possible?
How does kentucky get better receivers/better play out of the receiver position than a spread offense? It's unthinkable.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:33 pm to TigerCruise
Mauk is lucky to have had several of his passes dropped, because they went right to kentucky players.
Receivers are far, FAR from being "the problem" with this offense.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 10:43 pm to Jagd Tiger
quote:
Mauk is lucky to have had several of his passes dropped, because they went right to kentucky players.
Receivers are far, FAR from being "the problem" with this offense.
Atleast that would be a completion.
Seriously, name any team you have seen that has receivers that drop as many passes in their hands as we do.
I've NEVER seen a group this bad on any team
Posted on 9/27/15 at 8:28 am to Mizzoufan26
while Brown has not been perfect he has shown some real ability to catch the rock, Moore's hands are bad, Wingo is a converted DB and looks like it. The WR, OL and RB are all examples of how recruiting over time DOES matter.
Posted on 9/27/15 at 8:49 am to Tackle74
quote:
The WR, OL and RB are all examples of how recruiting over time DOES matter.
BOOM!
Posted on 9/27/15 at 9:11 am to Mizzou Mule
Well, Brown was a 4*. Moore was a 3* but had a ton of offers. Leftwich was probably the most lightly recruited, and he's been by far the most consistent.
Posted on 9/27/15 at 9:29 am to Wtodd
quote:
Edit: 111 yds rushing ain't going to get it done
I'm still bamfoozled by this team.
How are we so bad at WR, RB, OLine, and QB?
TE is the only area we are serviceable. And that's just serviceable.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News