Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/27/15 at 4:56 pm to mizslu314
Heard Blair showed real well in bowl practices
Posted on 1/27/15 at 5:09 pm to reedus23
I think Martin (if he qualifies) and Johnson will play for sure. Possibly Smith if he can get acclimated quickly enough.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 6:11 pm to reedus23
quote:
SOPHOMORES
Moore
Brown
FRESHMEN
Blair
DiLosa
Richard
COMMITS
Floyd
Martin
Hall
Smith
Johnson
Good lord the weapons Drew Lock will have when he's the QB.
BTW, when Danny Heitert was on the radio last week he noted Mauk's 34% intermediate completion percentage.
Thinks Lock has a real chance to be the starter in 2016 if Mauk doesn't improve his accuracy.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 6:38 pm to Mizz-SEC
I'm sorry but am I the only one drooling at what our offense will be like in 3 years? I know it's far away, but just think about it.
Stud QB in Lock
Stud WR in Martin, Smith
Stud Slot WR in Johnson
Stud RB in Strong
with solid rotational/2nd stringers at RB & WR
very exciting
Stud QB in Lock
Stud WR in Martin, Smith
Stud Slot WR in Johnson
Stud RB in Strong
with solid rotational/2nd stringers at RB & WR
very exciting
Posted on 1/27/15 at 7:12 pm to STL_MIZ
And you'll still have Brown and Moore as seniors at WR.
Posted on 2/28/15 at 9:31 pm to reedus23
Posted on 3/2/15 at 9:37 am to Mizz-SEC
quote:
I'm hoping TE Reese helps fill the void.
He certainly has the look of a prototype, receiving TE.
I'm with you on this - our offense may have put up better numbers last year, but our 2007 team with Coffman/Rutgers was truly unstoppable in the red zone. Taking the TE play up a level will help mast inefficiencies at WR.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 10:05 am to roadhouse
I look for Blanton to fill the receiving TE roll more than the others. Word is he has best hands on the team.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 10:25 am to wubilli
I agree about Blanton, kid has the makings of a really good TE. I think he was overlooked a bit in that class.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 10:39 am to seaniec04
He played at a HS that was super run heavy so didnt have much film showing what he was capable of. On the plus side he should be more advanced as a blocker.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 11:17 am to wubilli
And on the plus plus side, as a TE in Henson's system, you have got to be able to block. I don't know if the likes of Coffman and Rucker would have gotten the same opportunities under Henson.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News