Started By
Message
Athlon-SEC Power Rankings Ahead of Week 2
Posted on 9/7/23 at 1:38 am
Posted on 9/7/23 at 1:38 am
Here are the rankings:1) Georgia 2) Alabama 10) Vanderbilt 11) Mississippi State 12) South Carolina 13) Missouri 14) Florida
This isn't a surprise to me that Missouri is ranked behind Vandy and South Carolina. Might it be that Mizzou offense is that noticeably bad.
LINK
This isn't a surprise to me that Missouri is ranked behind Vandy and South Carolina. Might it be that Mizzou offense is that noticeably bad.
LINK
This post was edited on 9/7/23 at 1:48 am
3
Posted on 9/7/23 at 2:26 am to TrueLefty
We are anywhere from 5th to 10th ..not accurate
Posted on 9/7/23 at 6:25 am to Broz1839
quote:
We are anywhere from 5th to 10th ..not accurate
What I am saying is Vandy is rank ahead of Missouri in the standings. South Carolina record is 0-1. Shouldn't the Cocks be below Missouri in the standings? What I am thinking is Mizzou fans have been complaining about how bad Mizzou offense been. Plus, no down field threat so far and Brady Cook is the starting quarterback this year over Horn.
Posted on 9/7/23 at 7:05 am to TrueLefty
Yes.
Kick Cook off the team.
Start Horn.
Guaranteed 90 yard TD passes EVERY series.
National Championship for Mizzou.
Drink is sooooo stupid not to see this when our super fans know the answer.
Kick Cook off the team.
Start Horn.
Guaranteed 90 yard TD passes EVERY series.
National Championship for Mizzou.
Drink is sooooo stupid not to see this when our super fans know the answer.
Posted on 9/7/23 at 7:49 am to TrueLefty
It’s bc they didn’t watch, and just peeped the score and said oh that was sorta close for how bad SD is without knowing why
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:28 am to mizslu314
You thought the team looked more impressive than the final score indicated? I didn’t. Offense looked the same as last season, mediocre at best
Posted on 9/7/23 at 9:41 am to mouse_cop
It was 28-3 at half.
In fact I'll take it one step further. I would grade off/def an A- for the first half.
In fact I'll take it one step further. I would grade off/def an A- for the first half.
This post was edited on 9/7/23 at 9:43 am
Posted on 9/7/23 at 10:23 am to TrueLefty
Who gives 2 shits what anyone says.......IT WAS THE FIRST GAME OF THE YEAR!!!!!! Pretty sure 98% of the coaches would say their team didn't play great.
Wasn't it just last week when people on this board was touting SD's defense and how close the game would be? Game wasn't close and 2 QBs got to play entire halves.
Wasn't it just last week when people on this board was touting SD's defense and how close the game would be? Game wasn't close and 2 QBs got to play entire halves.
Posted on 9/7/23 at 11:36 am to JBlutarsky
quote:
JBlutarsky
Post less. Better yet. Stop posting.
Posted on 9/7/23 at 12:09 pm to GalacticaCannon
I think it's actually drink
Posted on 9/7/23 at 12:10 pm to mizslu314
They may have noted that our offense looked much the same as the one that struggled against Vanderbilt last year, while Vanderbilt looks improved.
Posted on 9/7/23 at 12:28 pm to Wtodd
quote:
Wasn't it just last week when people on this board was touting SD's defense and how close the game would be? Game wasn't close and 2 QBs got to play entire halves.
I went and searched and found no posts predicting a close game.
Posted on 9/8/23 at 9:37 am to notsince98
Posted on 9/8/23 at 11:14 am to Wtodd
I thought that thread was sarcasm
Posted on 9/8/23 at 12:40 pm to Indignity
Me too at first but it wasn't
Posted on 9/8/23 at 5:30 pm to Wtodd
Of course it was. Good grief.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News