Started By
Message
locked post

Add No More New Posters (Mizzou Included) to this Board Until Further Notice

Posted on 9/3/13 at 9:52 am
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 9:52 am
We should do what other team boards have successfully been doing to minimize troll alters:

First, require new posters to reach a minimum post count (example: 150 or 500 post count) before being added to the board. Make them prove themselves on the rant where eventually they will show their true colors.

A minimum post count will provide us with historical post data to analyze before we add the new poster to our board.

Second, if a poster is clearly an alter, ban the mutherfricka!

Ban...the...mutha...fricka!!!!!!!
This post was edited on 9/3/13 at 9:56 am
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 10:02 am to
Jesus, ban the piggie alter (Porker) already.

_____________________________________________

Stonehog
quote:

Guys, enough about the coke, we're a Pepsi school now.


Hawgeye
quote:

Crown & Pepsi always does the trick for me


CtotheVrzrbck
quote:

I can't make Old Charter and Cokes with Pepsi

quote:

What was your initial reaction to the stadium deal with Pepsi


This post was edited on 9/3/13 at 10:19 am
Posted by MizzouSEC2012
MIZZOU STUDENT SECTION
Member since Sep 2012
3621 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 10:22 am to
Agree! It feels like we're being infiltrated from the outside. MOTHER frickERS!
Posted by Bama Bird
Pittsburgh, PA
Member since Mar 2013
22910 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 10:24 am to
I think you guys just need to settle down a little. It's far from out of control
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 10:25 am to
Bama Bird

Don't forget that this is OUR board. If we feel we're being infiltrated, then we're being infiltrated. Hell, you're on here!

It's out of control.
Posted by Bama Bird
Pittsburgh, PA
Member since Mar 2013
22910 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 10:26 am to
Carry on as before
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 10:43 am to
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25492 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 11:25 am to
Meh, not sure if serious but the posters that have been granted access from other schools have been nothing but respectful. Most rarely post as it is. Our biggest problem is with those claiming to wear the black and gold when they don't.

I understand the frustration and concern, but isn't one of the goals to get more Mizzou posters here? If they have to pay their dues first by posting on the rant, the Mizzou numbers will never increase. They need a sanctuary where they can go whether it's their 1st or 10,000th post instead of throwing them to the wolves to earn their stripes. Personally, I'm for admitting anyone that claims Mizzou as their school and deal with them afterwards if they troll/flame their own board.
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
10302 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 11:33 am to
wat
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23188 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 11:40 am to
killz, I've requested his removal. Within a couple of weeks, I should be able to handle this myself, and then it'll be handled with a quickness that leaves a vapor trail. Have no fear.

What we're doing is working just fine for now. No posters from others schools have caused a problem, and we ferret out the alters pretty quick.

May your jimmies remain unrustled today, my friend.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 11:55 am to
Reedus,

I see what you're saying, except that the past few Mizzou posters who've been allowed to post on here have all been Porker alters.

I assume he's using a proxy server or the Admins just don't give a frick. Probably the latter.

Regardless, he's creating an alter army at whim and douching up our board...at whim. It usually takes about 2 weeks before the alter is removed, which is far too long.

If I had just limited Admin duties, those alters would've been banned before their 5th post....
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23188 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

If I had just limited Admin duties, those alters would've been banned before their 5th post....

Except that board admins don't yet have this ability. Should be in the next couple of weeks.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Except that board admins don't yet have this ability. Should be in the next couple of weeks



Well, that time can't arrive quick enough. When you finally receive ban privileges, I hope you identify douche targets (me excluded of course) and vaporize them with a quickness!

I'm not sure how much longer I can take this...
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23188 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 12:08 pm to
Killz, YGM.
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25492 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 12:14 pm to
I hear ya killz and agree with the sentiment. Just call me a frickin liberal because I'd rather let 1 guilty poster in and deal with him if it avoids condemning an innocent Mizzou poster.
This post was edited on 9/3/13 at 12:16 pm
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 12:20 pm to
...except we're not talking about innocent Mizzou posters.
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23188 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 12:56 pm to
No, what he's saying is that he doesn't want us to start restricting Mizzou posters just because we've gotten some alters. We'll figure out who the alters are quick enough. No need to place restrictions on new posterss.
Posted by Mizzeaux
Worshington
Member since Jun 2012
13908 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 1:01 pm to
Agree. Anything damaging an alter is going to do will take place on the rant. Here it's just annoying, but no big deal.
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25492 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

...except we're not talking about innocent Mizzou posters.


Semo hit it. I'm talking about the suggestion that we not allow any more Mizzou posters on the Mizzou board, which would result in those innocent posters being denied access because of the ones who are guilty.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 9/3/13 at 1:36 pm to
I get it.

However, I see nothing wrong with requiring all poster have a minimum post count. Even a post count of 50 would provide us with valuable data to determine the poster's true colors.

It doesn't take long for a poster to reach 50 posts.

If it takes forever for a poster to reach 50 posts, it stands to reason that the poster in question probably won't be contributing much to the Mizzou Board anyhow.

Not boolean login...but indeed sound logic.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter