Started By
Message

So my ban bet thread was whacked?
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:41 am
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:41 am
Why? There are dozens of straight up flame threads everyday that don't get whacked.
I start one that's purely for fun and it's gone.
I mean come on
I start one that's purely for fun and it's gone.
I mean come on
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:43 am to cas4t
I just read Chickens thread above about why threads are whacked and mine didn't fall into any of the categories.
Little insight would be appreciated.
Little insight would be appreciated.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:45 am to cas4t
There is little consistency in enforcement of site rules. Also you're an LSU fan so that's automatically going to put you up for extra scrutiny.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:47 am to cas4t
Do you think if I make another one, I will get banned? 

Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:48 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:False. LSU fans are allowed to constantly flame the SECr and nothing ever happens to them.
Also you're an LSU fan so that's automatically going to put you up for extra scrutiny.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:51 am to mwlewis
quote:
False. LSU fans are allowed to constantly flame the SECr and nothing ever happens to them.
lulz
I just looked through the first four pages and didn't find a single flame thread started by an LSU fan
Posted on 7/17/13 at 10:53 am to mwlewis
quote:
False. LSU fans are allowed to constantly flame the SECr and nothing ever happens to them.
Hardly.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 11:02 am to wadewilson
I honestly think the threads that are full of flames get left alone sometimes because they generate site traffic.
Not a single person flamed in my thread. It was all in good fun.
Ridiculous.
Not a single person flamed in my thread. It was all in good fun.
Ridiculous.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 11:16 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Also you're an LSU fan so that's automatically going to put you up for extra scrutiny.
This isn't true at all.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 11:48 am to Draconian Sanctions
Oh look. Draconian Sanctions is being a little bitch again. What a surprise.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 11:49 am to cas4t
I think if it was purely sig/avy bets it would've been fine. Ban bets aren't good for business.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 12:28 pm to mwlewis
quote:
LSU fans are allowed to constantly flame the SECr and nothing ever happens to them
This is 100% false.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 12:34 pm to mwlewis
quote:
LSU fans are allowed to constantly flame the SECr and nothing ever happens to them.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 1:59 pm to cas4t
quote:
So my ban bet thread was whacked?
Ban bets affect page views which is a business decision. Maybe an avi/sig bet would stay afloat a bit.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 2:03 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
That's what the whole thread was made up of. Avi/sig bets
This post was edited on 7/17/13 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 7/17/13 at 2:10 pm to WestCoastAg
There were a few ban bets proposed.
Posted on 7/17/13 at 2:17 pm to WestCoastAg
I think the OP title had 'ban' in it though, didn't it?
Posted on 7/17/13 at 2:25 pm to Chadaristic
Sure wish I could get some sort of explanation
Posted on 7/17/13 at 2:35 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
God forbid a few posters don't post for all of 2 months. I get what you're saying. But a better decision would be to maintain the quality of the board on a regular basis instead of whacking harmless threads that didn't break any rules.
Popular
Back to top
