Started By
Message
re: Now, I’ve never been jealous of MSUjr
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:13 pm to HalfCocked
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:13 pm to HalfCocked
I want someone from the leach tree truthfully. We have had a roster built for a pass heavy scheme for years.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:48 pm to clhawkins19
quote:
I feel that "style" would eventually turn off some of the important behind the scenes players (donors/boosters).
Because those folks are really pulling the strings to make us better right now.
I'f I'm them I'm not allocating a single resource to this dog shite program. Wealthy people don't stay wealthy by throwing their resources at piss poor investments. Anyone who thinks we weren't doing a little of what Clemson does a whole lot of during spurriers best years to keep that talent is a fool.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 10:25 pm to HalfCocked
quote:
piss poor investments
Unfortunately even with losses, the football team always makes money
Of course other than this year due to Covid
So it’s really not a poor investment considering we make so much money that we build new shite all around the campus (and that’s basically thanks to the TV deals etc)
This post was edited on 9/29/20 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 9/29/20 at 10:36 pm to I Bleed Garnet
I think you misunderstand what I was saying. Boosters and bag men investing in players to be misused by a dog shite coach. Would be the piss poor investment. And I'd think you'd be surprised where alot of those new things around the campus come from. One of Spurriers biggest fans is the main if not sole reason the outside of that stadium looks the way it does today.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 11:05 pm to HalfCocked
quote:
Boosters and bag men investing in players to be misused by a dog shite coach. Would be the piss poor investment
I don’t think we are getting the investments we got under Spurrier
And maybe that’s because our school doesn’t want to do the things we did under Spurrier?
I’ve always heard Muschamp is this master recruiter, and I haven’t seen much yet
I feel like Spurrier classes were always higher and he sent much more players to the NFL even after his first 5 seasons with us
Posted on 10/1/20 at 2:15 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
His issue won’t be putting up points. It will be stopping it
I’d say this was still right on Saturday
Posted on 10/1/20 at 2:16 pm to I Bleed Garnet
imo Steve Spurrier and his success in recruiting was almost entirely due to the state of SC churning out generational talent at the exact time that he was our coach and the instant that the in state talent dried up is when his team went to shite and he left.
Posted on 10/1/20 at 11:13 pm to GameCocky88
And Clemson wasn’t really a national powerhouse at the time. You can’t leave that out.
Posted on 10/2/20 at 8:26 am to SCgamecock2988
Getting fed u with having their asses whipped by us is one of the main reasons they became a power house.
Posted on 10/3/20 at 10:10 pm to I Bleed Garnet
I’d still take Leach all day long over Muschamp
Posted on 10/3/20 at 10:42 pm to CNB
quote:
I’d still take Leach all day long over Muschamp
Of course
Posted on 10/4/20 at 7:51 am to CNB
I have a feeling if Gus joins the unemployment line at seasons end then Tanner will cut Boom to hire him.
We are forever fricked.
We are forever fricked.
This post was edited on 10/4/20 at 7:52 am
Posted on 10/4/20 at 8:11 am to TiptonInSC
quote:
I have a feeling if Gus joins the unemployment line at seasons end then Tanner will cut Boom to hire him.
We are forever fricked.
I don’t think there will be any change for either team at the end of this season
Posted on 10/5/20 at 5:31 pm to CNB
I'd take Blanch fricking Callahan from Golden Girls over Muschamp.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 4:08 am to thatguy45
What way?
Having Leach, being entertained, and losing and winning games we shouldn’t?
Or
Having Muschamp, captain coach speak except for one video where he says a naughty and apologizes for it, losing games we shouldn’t and very rarely winning a game we shouldn’t?
Leach offense vs Muschamp offense?
Yeah I still feel this way. Kiffin would be the preferable choice of the two, however.
Having Leach, being entertained, and losing and winning games we shouldn’t?
Or
Having Muschamp, captain coach speak except for one video where he says a naughty and apologizes for it, losing games we shouldn’t and very rarely winning a game we shouldn’t?
Leach offense vs Muschamp offense?
Yeah I still feel this way. Kiffin would be the preferable choice of the two, however.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 4:09 am to thatguy45
To sum it up much more simply: we’re gonna fricking lose anyways, may as well have fun with it
Posted on 10/13/20 at 7:47 am to CNB
I agree
But Gimme Leach over Kiffin, atleast Leach would stay here for 6-7 years
But Gimme Leach over Kiffin, atleast Leach would stay here for 6-7 years
This post was edited on 10/13/20 at 8:14 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News