re: Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Former Athletes in Dispute with NCAA

Under Bart's reasoning, the question of whether or not players should be paid depends entirely on whether the athletics department at that school turns a profit. If they break even or operate at a loss they're not money making enterprises and therefore not businesses based on what he's laying out. So should some 7A Texas high school in a rich part of Dallas or Houston have to pay their players if they bring in more money from ticket sales, fundraisers, merchandise, etc. than they spend on coaching salaries, equipment, etc? Also, does an 8th grader who makes varsity violate child labor laws in that situation?