Started By
Message

re: Preseason SEC rankings for 2021.

Posted on 1/7/21 at 12:54 pm to
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27795 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 12:54 pm to
And passer rating is notorious for rewarding high volume passers, so that rating is generous. The reason Total QBR was created was to judge a QB based on all aspects of the game.

- High leverage situations weighted higher
- Rushing yards considered
- Sacks taken considered
- Strength of defense considered
- Contributing to TD drive

Passer Rating includes none of that.

Player A: 32/50, 450 yards, 3 TD, 1 INT, 4 sacks, 1 fumble, 0 rushing yards vs Vanderbilt

Player B: 20/32, 240 yards, 75 rushing yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, 0 Sacks, 0 fumbles vs Alabama

Using Passer Rating, Player A would be graded higher. It’s not a good stat at all.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 12:55 pm to
Agreed - his EPA Added was bad as well.

Brennan flashed some talent and made some explosive plays, but anytime he fell behind the chains he was just plain bad.

1st Down
192.6 Rating
35/59 (59%)
646 yards
10.9 YPA
8 TD
1 INT

Every Other Down
123.7 Rating
44/72 (61%)
466 yards
6.5 YPA
3 TD
2 INT
This post was edited on 1/7/21 at 12:59 pm
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33184 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

And passer rating is notorious for rewarding high volume passers,


No it’s not. It’s based on per attempt
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter