Started By
Message
re: Who is the worst coach in the SEC?
Posted on 11/8/20 at 6:27 pm to themetalreb
Posted on 11/8/20 at 6:27 pm to themetalreb
Probably Pruitt. The only reason that fatass hired him was to take away from Alabama. But he inherited a mess, so maybe not Pruitt.
Kirby should probably get an honorable mention if not the #1. For what he has been given, it's really bad the way he has screwed up the QB position.
Who is South Carolina going to get who's better than Muschamp? Are they just looking over at Clemson expecting the same results?
Mason is a Vandy coach, who the frick cares. Leach is there for the paycheck, it's the best Miss St could do.
Kirby should probably get an honorable mention if not the #1. For what he has been given, it's really bad the way he has screwed up the QB position.
Who is South Carolina going to get who's better than Muschamp? Are they just looking over at Clemson expecting the same results?
Mason is a Vandy coach, who the frick cares. Leach is there for the paycheck, it's the best Miss St could do.
This post was edited on 11/8/20 at 6:30 pm
Posted on 11/8/20 at 6:33 pm to 3down10
quote:
Leach
State is the only school in the Power 5 with 19 new starters. Was missing his 2 Tackles Saturday. Ppl think there aren't going to be pains for a new HC
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
Posted on 11/8/20 at 6:43 pm to 3down10
As other poster said, you can’t include coaches in year 1 or 2. Therefore, it’s Muschamp, no question.
There is 8.5 seasons of data at two different schools showing this guy trends down hard after year two and then the program just goes off a cliff by year 4.
That said, Kirby and Muschamp are so much alike that I believe had Kirby taken the SC job instead of UGA, we (SC) would not have much better results. I can say this because Muschamp somehow beat Kirby last year in Athens and Kirby seems to be trending the wrong way, but doing so with 5* talent. If Kirby can’t beat an inferior SC team coached by Muschamp, how good can he be?
There is 8.5 seasons of data at two different schools showing this guy trends down hard after year two and then the program just goes off a cliff by year 4.
That said, Kirby and Muschamp are so much alike that I believe had Kirby taken the SC job instead of UGA, we (SC) would not have much better results. I can say this because Muschamp somehow beat Kirby last year in Athens and Kirby seems to be trending the wrong way, but doing so with 5* talent. If Kirby can’t beat an inferior SC team coached by Muschamp, how good can he be?
This post was edited on 11/8/20 at 6:45 pm
Posted on 11/8/20 at 7:17 pm to 3down10
quote:Fulmer though he would try again and stick it to Bama. Like he did when he played NCAA investigator trying to get dirt on Bama. Well Karma has once again bit Fulmer in his arse.
Probably Pruitt. The only reason that fatass hired him was to take away from Alabama. But he inherited a mess, so maybe not Pruitt.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 6:31 am to 3down10
quote:
Who is South Carolina going to get who's better than Muschamp?
Freeze
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)