Toneski
| Favorite team: | Wofford |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 392 |
| Registered on: | 1/29/2013 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
She is loved by ESPN staff. I think she is like mom around there and very loved and appreciated. She also knows here stuff when she asks questions on the field.
0
re: Here is the problem with Indiana football ...
Posted by Toneski on 1/9/26 at 8:24 pm to GoldenDawg
It’s not a problem….its beautiful
Coaches used to make excuses about not being at a school with a winning tradition, not being able to recruit top talent, lack of facilities.
Cignetti has destroyed all previous excuses.
Cignetti has destroyed all previous excuses.
Every school with a $100 million AD budget not winning at least 10 games a year……
Posted by Toneski on 1/9/26 at 8:20 pm
is gonna want answers from their HC.
“How is Cignetti dominating in year 2 at frikkin’ Indiana with a 3 star roster and you’ve been here 3 years with a roster loaded with talent and still losing 4 games?”
“How is Cignetti dominating in year 2 at frikkin’ Indiana with a 3 star roster and you’ve been here 3 years with a roster loaded with talent and still losing 4 games?”
re: “It was a 14 point game and we had the ball with 7 and a half minutes to go” Kalen DeBoer
Posted by Toneski on 12/7/25 at 8:41 am to Dawgfanman
Negative rushing yards
re: After what Cignetti has done, there is no excuse for any coach anywhere to not win
Posted by Toneski on 12/6/25 at 11:04 pm to theballguy
I think you’re missing my point - how many times have you heard coaches say, we need better facilities, better talent, more money for NIL, etc, etc. Now any excuse a coach gives for not winning, all anyone has to do is point to Cignetti/Indiana. If someone can win there, a coach can surely win at any SEC school.
After what Cignetti has done, there is no excuse for any coach anywhere to not win
Posted by Toneski on 12/6/25 at 10:58 pm
I think Cignetti is why so many coaches got fired mid-season this year. When Cignetti is winning at friggin Indiana with a nobody roaster, other schools now know it’s not roster, facilities or tradition that’s keeping them from winning, it’s crappy coaching……and they’re not wasting time hoping their guy gets better.
It was a great year to be a good coach in the SEC because good coaches had great seasons. It doesn’t mean these good coaches are great coaches, but the fact so many SEC coaches were fired mid-season means a lot of SEC teams sucked. So good coaches looked great this season.
Would love to see the melt if Lane gets an NFL offer in the next few weeks
Posted by Toneski on 12/1/25 at 10:04 am
LSU just got into a relationship with the hot hairstylist in the “Hot Crazy Matrix” of women. LSU may end up with their car keyed and their pet rabbit in a boiling pot of water.
Lane DGAS about burning down a program and LSU better hope he doesn’t get and NFL offer between now and end of January.
Lane DGAS about burning down a program and LSU better hope he doesn’t get and NFL offer between now and end of January.
re: John Mateer
Posted by Toneski on 9/6/25 at 9:48 am to Soonerthanlater
I prefer redneck and additionally, your post is dumb
ESPN matchup predictor currently has Bama losing to UGA, Mizzou, Tenn, SC and AU
Posted by Toneski on 9/6/25 at 9:45 am
nm
re: Goodman: Get it over with and fire Kalen DeBoer
Posted by Toneski on 8/31/25 at 6:13 pm to Wolfhound45
Goodman must have forgotten how many coaches Bama went through between Bryant and Saban…..none of those coaches between Bryant and Saban found it easy. He also must have forgotten that Bama hiring Saban was a desperate move after Rich effin Rodriguez and Spurrier turned them down.
Bama is an average program unless they can hire the greatest to ever coach the game.
Bama is an average program unless they can hire the greatest to ever coach the game.
Citrus Bowl payout $8.5 million per team. 1st round playoff payout $4 million per team
Posted by Toneski on 12/21/24 at 6:28 pm
Wouldn’t have thought this to be the case
Conferences need to agree on an algorithm with a SOS emphasis, then let AI pick the teams
Posted by Toneski on 12/21/24 at 1:09 pm
Without SOS being a major factor, why would any team play tough P5 opponents…..it’s pointless from a playoff perspective.
The committee is human and therefore incapable of accurately determining SOS. Ditch the committe and turn this over to a computer/AI.
The committee is human and therefore incapable of accurately determining SOS. Ditch the committe and turn this over to a computer/AI.
ESPN, etal, who are paying big money to televise this garbage will force a change
Posted by Toneski on 12/21/24 at 12:56 pm
TV wanted a 12 team playoff and we got it, and TV will want better matchups next year. That likely means this format gets changed by next year and we don’t have to wait until 2026.
re: Playoff committee has egg on their faces
Posted by Toneski on 12/21/24 at 12:50 pm to Utah_CUtiger
quote:
Putting in 9-3 teams devalues the regular season though
Why does the NCAA basketball committee put in 10 loss teams over 6 loss teams?
It’s because they understand who you played in the regular season matters.
Indiana #1 rushing defense at 76 ypg. ND has 131 yards in 1st quarter
Posted by Toneski on 12/20/24 at 7:47 pm
If SOS isn’t given more weight next year it’s a travesty
Clemson is one of the few schools who has a tradition of allowing fans on the field after the game ends. This can be traced back to at least the 70’s when this tradition allowed the fans to give players $100 handshakes.
re: Who actually deserved to be in the playoffs? Bama, Ole Miss or USCe.
Posted by Toneski on 12/4/24 at 12:46 pm to PappyGarcia
Those saying SC shouldn’t be ranked above teams they lost to, then why was Tennessee ranked below Bama after losing their 2nd game (to Georgia) even though they had beaten Bama weeks prior? Both Bama and UT had 2 losses at the time.
Apparently, it’s when you lose in season that matters. We’ve always known this. I don’t know why people suddenly think a team can’t be ranked above a team it lost to - it’s happened thousands of times in the past.
Apparently, it’s when you lose in season that matters. We’ve always known this. I don’t know why people suddenly think a team can’t be ranked above a team it lost to - it’s happened thousands of times in the past.
Is someone in here at the game and posting in the game thread?
SCAR has 2 ranked wins, TAMU and Mizzou. If SCAR beats Clem and Mizzou stays ranked, SCAR will have 3 ranked wins on the season.
Popular
23
