Started By
Message
re: Burrow sucks more than the Browns
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:23 am to diddlydawg7
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:23 am to diddlydawg7
Well if that was the case, the Bengals have been around more than last season so your math is still wrong
The win percentage should be even higher without Burrow. See how idiotic your arbitrary math is?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
The win percentage should be even higher without Burrow. See how idiotic your arbitrary math is?
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:27 am to Tigas96
quote:
Well if that was the case, the Bengals have been around more than last season so your math is still wrong
Ok. I meant to put “2019 Bengals”
quote:
See how idiotic your arbitrary math is?
You still don’t get it. This would be an issue if I had made any conclusions. I didn’t. I’m just listing straight facts.
It’s impossible for math to be idiotic. It’s either true or not.
The conclusions you form from math can be idiotic, but not the math itself. I never even came up with any conclusions so there’s really nothing to complain about.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)