Started By
Message

re: Burrow sucks more than the Browns

Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:23 am to
Posted by Tigas96
Member since Mar 2019
241 posts
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:23 am to
Well if that was the case, the Bengals have been around more than last season so your math is still wrong
The win percentage should be even higher without Burrow. See how idiotic your arbitrary math is?
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27795 posts
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:27 am to
quote:

Well if that was the case, the Bengals have been around more than last season so your math is still wrong


Ok. I meant to put “2019 Bengals”

quote:

See how idiotic your arbitrary math is?


You still don’t get it. This would be an issue if I had made any conclusions. I didn’t. I’m just listing straight facts.

It’s impossible for math to be idiotic. It’s either true or not.

The conclusions you form from math can be idiotic, but not the math itself. I never even came up with any conclusions so there’s really nothing to complain about.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter