Started By
Message

re: Burrow sucks more than the Browns

Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:16 am to
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27795 posts
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:16 am to
quote:

What does your pea size brain not get by you comparing a percentage of 12 games to 2 games


Bengals WP without Burrow: 0.125

Bengals WP with Burrow: 0.000

Your problem is that you are assuming that I compared the data and drew conclusions from the data. I didn’t. I listed the data so everyone can make their own conclusions based on the information at hand. Everyone knows that we’ve only played two games in 2020 but it doesn’t change the fact that their winning percentage is 0.

You are getting really upset about me providing information for everyone. You should really stop and think about what you are saying before you let the emotions get the better of you and resort to name-calling and anger.

quote:

Do you see how more data gives you a more accurate reading


It does. But I’m only listing the data we have at hand

Try not to be so angry over facts.
Posted by Tigas96
Member since Mar 2019
241 posts
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:23 am to
Well if that was the case, the Bengals have been around more than last season so your math is still wrong
The win percentage should be even higher without Burrow. See how idiotic your arbitrary math is?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter