Started By
Message
re: Would Mizzou have won their 2 div titles if they were in the west?
Posted on 6/18/20 at 8:24 am to MizzouTrue
Posted on 6/18/20 at 8:24 am to MizzouTrue
quote:
Auburn was better than LSU and they beat Bama far and square
I mean 2013 Auburn should’ve lost to a Georgia team (y’all lost to btw) that we stomped. 2013 LSU also lost to Ole Miss, another team we stomped
So the transitive property of Missouri beating UGA by 15 means they are better than LSU because UGA beat LSU by 3. Who can argue with that?
Oh wait, the transitive property of LSU beating Auburn by 14, who then beat Missouri by 17 says you're full of shite.
Solid work, and also the exact reason why using the transitive property is never a good idea.
1
Posted on 6/18/20 at 9:20 am to RB10
You lost at Oxford and Athens, two places we won at by two touchdowns
2013 LSU was good but Mizzou would’ve destroyed that defense. Our pass rush would’ve been tough to stop too. Too bad we never got to see it.
2013 LSU was good but Mizzou would’ve destroyed that defense. Our pass rush would’ve been tough to stop too. Too bad we never got to see it.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News