Started By
Message
re: OT-: Let's Talk Socialism
Posted on 4/3/20 at 5:38 pm to meansonny
Posted on 4/3/20 at 5:38 pm to meansonny
quote:
The Klan. Jim crow. Those arent conservative/republican/libertarian ideas. Shame on you for rewriting history.
While they aren't originally Republican and certainly are not libertarian, they most assuredly are conservative.
Give me a break on the whole "Democrats started them". It's so tired and lazy. All those people are now Republicans. That process started after Johnson (a Democrat) ended Jim Crow with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And that process finally concluded in 1994 when the last Dixiecrats finally switched parties.
I mean, there is a reason why Tim Scott is literally the only Republican Congressman who is black.
quote:
Where is the federal government better than the private sector in our lives?
It's really a fundamental question about whether you believe every moment of our lives should be geared toward generating short-term monetary profits. The argument goes that certain areas of our life are too important to be monetized for shareholders, be it education, healthcare, national defense, conservation, or something else. Having worked in the public and private sector, I can't really tell a difference in the quality of work by employees. The big difference, however, is in quality of leadership. If we elected better leaders, regardless of party, then government would work better for us. Saying that our government sucks is really nothing more than a self-indictment.
But to answer your question, the military, for one. I don't want a bunch of mercenaries representing the U.S. who were too fat or too stupid to get into the military, but want to be a part of the "thank you for your service culture." And there are plenty of powerful folks salivating to dismantle our military because if given the opportunity to own a mercenary company, it will make them a fortune on the back of American taxpayers.
Posted on 4/3/20 at 9:24 pm to baconwaffle
Why is it that a general consensus that a government should have a standing military be, by socialists, over and over and over, a rationalization for socialism?
Posted on 4/4/20 at 3:36 am to baconwaffle
The parties didn't switch, that's a damned lie.
Posted on 4/4/20 at 2:09 pm to baconwaffle
quote:
Give me a break on the whole "Democrats started them". It's so tired and lazy.
Premise #1: the truth is tired and lazy
quote:
Johnson (a Democrat)
Premise #2 : the war on poverty helps black people
quote:
The argument goes that certain areas of our life are too important to be monetized for shareholders, be it education, healthcare, national defense, conservation, or something else
Premise #3 : baconwaffle has no examples where public industries are better
quote:
The big difference, however, is in quality of leadership.
Premise #4 : failure of leadership. But baconwaffle will bitch when companies compete against one another for the best leadership (ceo compensation)
quote:
to answer your question, the military, for one
The US military has been around for over 220 years. But they dont invent/manufacture their own weapons, aircraft/transport/facilities. The greatness and advantages of the US military are private. America has great military families. But so does every country. America also has a military population that enlist because of a lack of opportunities.
I'm not convinced that the military's superiority isnt bought through the private sector.
If you want to agree to disagree with me, so be it.
quote:
the military, for one
It sounds like that is the only one that you will stand behind and I argue the military greatness is bought with taxpayer dollars in the private sector.
The rest of that paragraph is drivel, imo.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)