Started By
Message

re: OT-: Let's Talk Socialism

Posted on 4/3/20 at 10:20 am to
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64555 posts
Posted on 4/3/20 at 10:20 am to
quote:

BUT Lets talk corporate socialism. Boeing got 18 billion of the stimulus - why?


Is Boeing considered part of our national security infrastructure? Don't they make a whole bunch of our airforce stuff? Them going out of business would compromise our national security, wouldn't it?


quote:

I thought the "market" fixed everything and the market would correct the weak in favor of the "strong".


You can take that argument up with an anarchist or libertarian. That's a strawman argument against garden variety conservatives and republicans.


Posted by baconwaffle
Houston
Member since Jan 2013
589 posts
Posted on 4/3/20 at 12:11 pm to
I'm a little late to the discussion here, but I wanted to weigh in on Kneehigh's troglodyte argument of: "hurr durr, Nazi stands for National Socialist, that means that you liberals and Democrats are the Nazis and love Hitler, hurr durr."

History is a wonderful thing, so let us take a historical perspective. It is true that in its early days, the NSDAP was both nationalist and socialist; hence its name. They sought to dismantle Germany's powerful industrial culture and transfer the means of production to normal folks, provided they were White and non-Jewish. However, as Hitler gained power, Germany's industrial titans did not like what they were seeing, so they sought to gain influence from the inside of the party. This culminated with the so-called Night of the Long Knives, when Ernst Rohm, the leader of the SA and the socialist god-father of the party, was killed by Heinrich Himmler and his corporate-oriented SS. At this point, with the exception of safety net programs, the Nazi party adopted a fascist economic model, despite keeping its original name.

And that's just the economic side. Let's not forget about the nationalist side. Nationalism, at least by the Continental definition, means creating a society in which those with a different skin color, religion, language, or alienage are not tolerated. I grew up in rural Gwinnett County back when Klan rallies still happened openly. I still remember the faces and names of the guys who sat at my high school lunch table who would regularly talk about the need to send "the n*ggers back to Africa." Rest be assured they are all Republicans today. It's simply ludicrous to suggest that the Republican party is the party of religious and racial inclusivity, and that the Democrats are the party of Hitler.

Digressing back to main topic of the OP: I personally do not endorse many policies that, for example, Senator Sanders endorses. But there are worse outcomes in our life than America's insurance industry being nationalized. Just because a self-described socialist wants to nationalize an industry that has caused - arguably - more harm than good to the American people, doesn't mean he wants to nationalize every industry.
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24643 posts
Posted on 4/3/20 at 12:29 pm to
I genuinely question why we’re bailing out the cruise lines after they’ve been foreign flagged (all of them) to avoid paying taxes.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter