Started By
Message

re: So what does this offense bring us in 2020?

Posted on 1/20/20 at 10:42 pm to
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 1/20/20 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

What? I just proved you wrong about your 1st down idiocy and you want me to "apologize"

2 TD possessions were the result of 1st down runs I just got the sequence wrong but it still doesn't disproves your idiocy
Right, I'm the idiot because I'm showing why Coley is out and Monken is in, and why Kirby made these decisions, and you're sitting here essentially trying to convince us that Coley was doing what Kirby wanted all along.

I mean WTF does Kirby know, right? He obviously believes a fallacy and should just listen to guys like you.

Hell, while you're at it, you should tell Nick Saban he's an idiot too, for basically telling Kirby on TV during the LSU-Clemson game that he had to adapt and do something different.

"Different??" According to you, Coley already adapted and was doing it right. Man, Saban and Kirby are fricking idiots for not just keeping Coley and mimicking the Auburn game. Lord knows we'd be putting up 40 ppg next season if Kirby didn't believe in a fallacy.

ROFL
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25753 posts
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

Coley already adapted


He did. If you cant see the difference in the playcalling from the first 4 games to midseason to the end of the season then there isnt much to talk about.

quote:

and was doing it right.

Just because you change the playcalling doesnt mean that the new plays are successful. But Coley apparently listened to the message boards. Over the course of the season, we saw more passes over the middle and more RPOs. But over the course of the season, we were running plays not repped in the offseason with a fatigued WR/OL group. We weren't successful on the new playcalling except for Florida and Baylor. That is why Coley is gone. Because he couldnt find any identity within the offense (even with the playcalling changes through the course of the year)

RD is right. There are message board narratives that are lazy. They are perpetuated despite being half truths or flat out wrong. This is the first time that I have seen blaming a 50/50 choice to start a series for our offensive woes.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27303 posts
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

Right, I'm the idiot because I'm showing why Coley is out and Monken is in,


Nope, you're idiocy was due to fact that you continually made incorrect statements about his 1st down play calling and instead of fessing up you doubled down.

My entire point was that there were issues other than Coley that made this offense what it was.I was pointing out his play calling sequence did in fact change starting with UF...it had to and you just sat around claiming "run,run,pass,punt" and "predictable".Jake,the WR and the OL contributed to the ineptitude along with Coley.

quote:

Coley was doing what Kirby wanted all along.


Kirby certainly has a say so but the only game that I claimed Coley was doing exactly what Kirby wanted was the 2nd half of AU...sorry,and if you don't see his handprints all over the play calling after we got a 21 pt lead you really haven't watched much of Kirby's games.

BTW,Auburn had a very good defense especially their DL.I was pretty happy with going up by 21 pts up after 2 1/2 qtrs.I mean,these guys did hold LSU to 23 pts.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter