Started By
Message

re: Only 8 SEC Conference games?

Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by KC Tiger
Member since Sep 2006
4621 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

That’s not the point. By playing less conference games, the league negates 7 guaranteed losses


There are two separate issues the OP is complaining about:

#1 - By playing fewer conference games the SEC is allowed to artificially inflate its perceived dominance. The OP argues that even if the SEC inserts a very difficult "9th" game it is highly unlikely that half of the SEC teams would lose (which would obviously happen if the conference played each other in a "9th" game).

#2 - The SEC has easier schedules bc they don't play a 9th conference game. This is subjective and must be taken on a case by case basis. It depends on who each team schedules as their "9th" game. A & M scheduled Clemson, Auburn scheduled Oregon, LSU scheduled Texas, Georgia scheduled Notre Dame.

Issue #1 may be a valid complaint. Issue #2 is absolutely not valid unless a team schedules only patsy non-conference opponents.
Posted by Atlbear16
Atlanta
Member since Dec 2017
1453 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:33 pm to
Wtf you mean may be a valid complaint? It’s 100% valid and negates 7 additional guaranteed loses.


But you are right everywhere else. God speed
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter